Literature DB >> 19656740

International multicenter study of safety and effectiveness of Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band in 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up cohorts.

James Toouli1, Lillian Kow, Almino C Ramos, Franz Aigner, Piet Pattyn, Manoel P Galvão-Neto, Karl A Miller, Stefania Romano, Mario Gutierrez, Jeremy Jokinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No long-term, international, multicenter studies of the effectiveness and safety of the SAGB in morbid obesity have been previously published. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band (SAGB) at 6 bariatric centers in Australia, Europe, and Brazil, with < or =5 years of follow-up; the effect on patient covariates; and changes in co-morbidity.
METHODS: A 2-phase study design was used, involving both retrospective and prospective data. SAGB was implanted by way of the pars flaccida 1, 3, and 5 years previously. The retrospective phase entailed a review of the records. The prospective phase included a subset of eligible patients who agreed to undergo additional clinical assessments. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), patient level predictors, change in co-morbidities, and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 481 patients in 3 mutually exclusive follow-up cohorts (1 yr, n = 200; 3 yr, n = 184; 5 yr, n = 97) participated in the present study. Of these 481 patients, 339 (1 yr, n = 139; 3 yr, n = 131; 5 yr, n = 69) underwent prospective evaluations. The mean %EWL was 43.5% + or - 21.8%, 57.7% + or - 25.9%, and 49.8% + or - 27.6% and the mean change in body mass index was -7.64, -10.75, and -9.52 in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cohorts, respectively (P <.001). Gender and age did not predict the %EWL; however, a greater preoperative body mass index was inversely related to the %EWL. Longer postimplantation times were associated with greater improvement in co-morbidities and with greater frequencies of reoperation. Fewer than 15% of the patients in the 5-year cohort had undergone band removal and 10% required band revisions. No fatal or life-threatening complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: SAGB is safe and effective in inducing weight loss and improvement of co-morbidities in morbidly obese patients at international bariatric centers at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656740     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2009.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  13 in total

1.  The relationship between esophageal peristalsis and in vivo intraband pressure measurements in gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Sudip K Ghosh; Mario Gutierrez; Karin Dolezalova; Tamara Widenhouse; Gaspar Gayoso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Masha Livhits; Cheryl Mercado; Irina Yermilov; Janak A Parikh; Erik Dutson; Amir Mehran; Clifford Y Ko; Melinda Maggard Gibbons
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  M Fried; V Yumuk; J M Oppert; N Scopinaro; A Torres; R Weiner; Y Yashkov; G Frühbeck
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Outcomes of Two-Step Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Reasons for the Gastric Banding Explantation Matter.

Authors:  Savio George Barreto; Jacob Chisholm; Ann Schloithe; Jane Collins; Lilian Kow
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Laparoscopic greater curvature plication: initial results of an alternative restrictive bariatric procedure.

Authors:  Almino Ramos; Manoel Galvao Neto; Manoela Galvao; Luis Fernando Evangelista; Josemberg Marins Campos; Alvaro Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Management of Gastric Obstruction Caused by Adjustable Gastric Band.

Authors:  David Czeiger; Shadi Abu-Swis; Gad Shaked; Amnon Ovnat; Gilbert Sebbag
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Is Gastric Banding Appropriate in Indigenous Or Remote-Dwelling Persons?

Authors:  P John Treacy; Mark D Chatfield; Justin Bessell
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Evaluation of the Swedish adjustable gastric band VC (SAGB-VC) in an Australian population: early results.

Authors:  Jennifer B Keogh; Anthony Brancatisano; Sue F Taylor; Fiona McDonald; Roy Brancatisano; Jeffrey M Hamdorf; Jacob Chisholm; Lillian Kow; Sara Wahlroos; Brendan Ryan; Jim Toouli
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.