Literature DB >> 19656554

Grammatical aspect and mental simulation.

Benjamin Bergen1, Kathryn Wheeler.   

Abstract

When processing sentences about perceptible scenes and performable actions, language understanders activate perceptual and motor systems to perform mental simulations of those events. But little is known about exactly what linguistic elements activate modality-specific systems during language processing. While it is known that content words, like nouns and verbs, influence the content of a mental simulation, the role of grammar is less well understood. We investigate the role of grammatical markers in mental simulation through two experiments in which we manipulate the meanings of sentences by modifying the grammatical aspect they use. Using the Action-sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE) methodology [Glenberg, A., Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558-565], we show that progressive sentences about hand motion facilitate manual action in the same direction, while perfect sentences that are identical in every way except their aspect do not. The broader implication of this finding for language processing is that while content words tell understanders what to mentally simulate and what brain regions to use in performing these simulations, grammatical constructions such as aspect modulate how those simulations are performed. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656554     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  17 in total

1.  Body part representations in verbal semantics.

Authors:  Benjamin Bergen; Ting-Ting Chan Lau; Shweta Narayan; Diana Stojanovic; Kathryn Wheeler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Future Tense and Economic Decisions: Controlling for Cultural Evolution.

Authors:  Seán G Roberts; James Winters; Keith Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Linking Neuroimaging with Functional Linguistic Analysis to Understand Processes of Successful Communication.

Authors:  Matthew Brook O'Donnell; Emily B Falk
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2015-03-17

4.  The influence of state change on object representations in language comprehension.

Authors:  Xin Kang; Anita Eerland; Gitte H Joergensen; Rolf A Zwaan; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

5.  Do not resonate with actions: sentence polarity modulates cortico-spinal excitability during action-related sentence reading.

Authors:  Marco Tullio Liuzza; Matteo Candidi; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers.

Authors:  Marit Lobben; Stefania D'Ascenzo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-27

7.  When does perception facilitate or interfere with conceptual processing? The effect of attentional modulation.

Authors:  Louise Connell; Dermot Lynott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02

8.  Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions.

Authors:  Sarah E Anderson; Teenie Matlock; Michael Spivey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-01

Review 9.  Production of Verb Tense in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Meta-Analysis and Further Data.

Authors:  Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah; Laura Friedman
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 10.  Perspective taking in language: integrating the spatial and action domains.

Authors:  Madeleine E L Beveridge; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.