Literature DB >> 19656182

Chromosomal inversions and species differences: when are genes affecting adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation expected to reside within inversions?

Jeffrey L Feder1, Patrik Nosil.   

Abstract

Many factors can promote speciation, and one which has received much attention is chromosomal inversions. A number of models propose that the recombination suppressing effects of inversions facilitate the maintenance of differences between interbreeding populations in genes affecting adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation. These models predict that such genes will disproportionately reside within inversions, rather than in collinear regions. This hypothesis has received some support, but exceptions exist. Additionally, the effects of known low levels of recombination within inversions on these models are uninvestigated. Here, simulations are used to compare the maintenance of genetic differences between populations following secondary contact and hybridization in different inversion models. We compare regions with no recombination within them to regions with low recombination and to collinear regions with free recombination. Our most general finding is that the low levels of recombination within an inversion often result in the loss of accentuated divergence in inverted regions compared to collinear ones. We conclude that inversions can facilitate the maintenance of species differences under some conditions, but that large or qualitative differences between inverted and collinear regions need not occur. We also find that strong selection facilitates maintenance of divergence in a manner analogous to inversions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656182     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00786.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  48 in total

1.  Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Andrew P Michel; Sheina Sim; Thomas H Q Powell; Michael S Taylor; Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Richard Gejji; Sam Yeaman; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Ecological genomics of Anopheles gambiae along a latitudinal cline: a population-resequencing approach.

Authors:  Changde Cheng; Bradley J White; Colince Kamdem; Keithanne Mockaitis; Carlo Costantini; Matthew W Hahn; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations.

Authors:  Rafael F Guerrero; François Rousset; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Mark Currey; William A Cresko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation?

Authors:  Benjamin Charles Jackson
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  The evolution of recombination rates in finite populations during ecological speciation.

Authors:  James Reeve; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Jan Engelstädter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Genomic rearrangements and the evolution of clusters of locally adaptive loci.

Authors:  Sam Yeaman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The population structure and recent colonization history of Oregon threespine stickleback determined using restriction-site associated DNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Susan Bassham; Taylor Wilson; Mark Currey; Conor O'Brien; Quick Yeates; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.