Literature DB >> 19656148

Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel.

C E Pennell1, J J Henderson, M J O'Neill, S McChlery, S McCleery, D A Doherty, J E Dickinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and patient satisfaction of three methods of labour induction (double balloon catheters, single balloon catheters and prostaglandin gel) in term nulliparous women with unfavourable cervices.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: A total of 330 nulliparous women with unfavourable cervices induced at term.
METHODS: Three cervical ripening study arms were used: double balloon catheter (107 women); 16F Foley catheter (110 women) and PGE(2) gel (2 mg) (113 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Caesarean section, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: There was no difference in caesarean delivery rates between groups (double balloon 43%, single balloon 36%, PGE(2) 37%, P = 0.567). The induction to delivery interval was longer in the double balloon group (median 24.5; 95% CI 23.7, 30.6 hours) than the single balloon (23.2; 20.8, 25.8 hours) or PGE(2) (23.8; 21.7, 26.8 hours) (P = 0.043). Uterine hyperstimulation occurred in 14% of the PGE(2) group with none occurring with mechanical cervical ripening. Cord blood gases were worse in the PGE(2) group: median arterial pH double balloon 7.26 (range 7.03-7.40); single balloon 7.26 (7.05-7.44); PGE(2) 7.25 (6.91-7.41) (P = 0.050). Cervical ripening with the single balloon catheter was associated with significantly less pain (pain score > or =4: double balloon 55%, single balloon 36%, PGE(2) 63%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Labour induction in nullipara with unfavourable cervices results in high caesarean delivery rates. Although all methods in this study had similar efficacy, the single balloon catheter offers the best combination of safety and patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656148     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  30 in total

1.  Off-label use of misoprostol and oxytocin.

Authors:  Athol Kent
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Induction of Labour: Change of Method and its Effects.

Authors:  S Kehl; C Weiss; U Dammer; E Raabe; S Burghaus; J Heimrich; J Hackl; M Winkler; M W Beckmann; F Faschingbauer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  C Lindblad Wollmann; M Ahlberg; G Petersson; S Saltvedt; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

Authors:  W Rath; S Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Javier Vega Cañadas; María Teulón González; Natalia Pagola Limón; María Sanz Alguacil; María García-Luján Prieto; Rocío Canete Riaza; Rosa Montero-Macías
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sheri Ee-Lin Lim; Toh Lick Tan; Grace Yang Huang Ng; Shephali Tagore; Ei Ei Phyo Kyaw; George Seow Heong Yeo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  A lariat-based dilatation device for hysteroscopy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Donghua Shen; Kaiwei Ma; Mengqian Tian; Lan Li; Qing Jiang; Xingsong Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

8.  Single versus Double-Balloon Transcervical Catheter for Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Samantha X de Los Reyes; Jeanne S Sheffield; Ahizechukwu C Eke
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Amanda Henry; Arushi Madan; Rachel Reid; Sally K Tracy; Kathryn Austin; Alec Welsh; Daniel Challis
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.