Anne E Becker1, Jennifer J Thomas, Kathleen M Pike. 1. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. anne_becker@hms.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cross-cultural data suggest that rationales for food refusal vary in anorexia nervosa (AN), and a variant, termed non-fat-phobic AN (NFP-AN), has been described. This review evaluates whether data support modification of the requirement for intense fear of weight gain to meet AN criterion B in DSM-V. METHOD: We performed a systematic search of the Medline and PsychInfo literature and evaluated the relevant publications by Robins and Guze's (Am J Psychiatry 126, 983-987, 1970) criteria as a standard for diagnostic validity. We also performed a meta-analysis comparing the severity of eating pathology in AN to (a) NFP-AN and (b) AN with low drive for thinness (low-DT-AN). RESULTS: A modest literature indicates that NFP-AN has wide geographic distribution and occurs in both Western and non-Western populations alongside cases of typical AN. Aggregating across eligible studies, patients with NFP-AN or low-DT-AN score at least 2/3 of a standard deviation lower on measures of eating pathology than patients with conventional AN. Transcultural comparison of drive for thinness suggests significantly lower norms in non-Western cultures. DISCUSSION: NFP-AN occurs with wide distribution. Further research is necessary on the course and outcomes of NFP-AN to characterize its congruence with, or distinction from, conventional AN. We discuss several options for including a description of NFP-AN in DSM-V.
OBJECTIVE: Cross-cultural data suggest that rationales for food refusal vary in anorexia nervosa (AN), and a variant, termed non-fat-phobic AN (NFP-AN), has been described. This review evaluates whether data support modification of the requirement for intense fear of weight gain to meet AN criterion B in DSM-V. METHOD: We performed a systematic search of the Medline and PsychInfo literature and evaluated the relevant publications by Robins and Guze's (Am J Psychiatry 126, 983-987, 1970) criteria as a standard for diagnostic validity. We also performed a meta-analysis comparing the severity of eating pathology in AN to (a) NFP-AN and (b) AN with low drive for thinness (low-DT-AN). RESULTS: A modest literature indicates that NFP-AN has wide geographic distribution and occurs in both Western and non-Western populations alongside cases of typical AN. Aggregating across eligible studies, patients with NFP-AN or low-DT-AN score at least 2/3 of a standard deviation lower on measures of eating pathology than patients with conventional AN. Transcultural comparison of drive for thinness suggests significantly lower norms in non-Western cultures. DISCUSSION: NFP-AN occurs with wide distribution. Further research is necessary on the course and outcomes of NFP-AN to characterize its congruence with, or distinction from, conventional AN. We discuss several options for including a description of NFP-AN in DSM-V.
Authors: Robyn Sysko; Christina A Roberto; Rachel D Barnes; Carlos M Grilo; Evelyn Attia; B Timothy Walsh Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jocilyn E Dellava; Laura M Thornton; Paul Lichtenstein; Nancy L Pedersen; Cynthia M Bulik Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: L Dell'Osso; Barbara Carpita; D Muti; I M Cremone; G Massimetti; E Diadema; C Gesi; C Carmassi Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Jennifer E Wildes; Marsha D Marcus; Ross D Crosby; Rebecca M Ringham; Marcela Marin Dapelo; Jill A Gaskill; Kelsie T Forbush Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2011-10
Authors: Grace E Monterubio; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Katherine N Balantekin; Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit; Neha J Goel; Olivia Laing; Marie-Laure Firebaugh; Rachael E Flatt; Patricia Cavazos-Rehg; C Barr Taylor; Denise E Wilfley Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 4.861