Literature DB >> 19654611

Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females.

J M Gleason1, R A James, C Wicker-Thomas, M G Ritchie.   

Abstract

The genetics of sexual isolation, behavioral differences between species that prevent mating, is understood poorly. Pheromonal differences between species can influence sexual isolation in many animals and in some cases a single locus can cause large functional changes in pheromonal mating signals. Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) can function as pheromones and consequently affect mate recognition. In a previous study of the two major CHCs in females that affect mating discrimination between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia, quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified on the X and third chromosome, and a few candidate genes were potentially implicated. Here we specifically test candidate genes for CHC biosynthesis and determine the genetic architecture of four additional CHCs that differ in abundance between D. simulans and D. sechellia females. The same QTL, and new ones, were found for additional CHCs. By examining all these CHCs and exploring their covariance, we were able to ascribe putative function to the major QTL. Although desaturases have received considerable attention for their role in CHC biosynthesis, evidence here implies that elongases may be just as important. Sex determination genes do not seem to have a role in this species difference although D. sechellia is sexually dimorphic in CHCs, whereas D. simulans is not. Epistatic interactions, only detected for CHCs limited to D. sechellia, imply that complex interactions among loci may also be having a role in these compounds that affect mating isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19654611     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  30 in total

1.  A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data.

Authors:  Daniel P Rice; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Tissue-Specific cis-Regulatory Divergence Implicates eloF in Inhibiting Interspecies Mating in Drosophila.

Authors:  Peter A Combs; Joshua J Krupp; Neil M Khosla; Dennis Bua; Dmitri A Petrov; Joel D Levine; Hunter B Fraser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Speciation: On the Scent of Mate Discrimination Genes.

Authors:  Jennifer M Coughlan; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The Genetics of Mating Song Evolution Underlying Rapid Speciation: Linking Quantitative Variation to Candidate Genes for Behavioral Isolation.

Authors:  Mingzi Xu; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  No boundaries: genomes, organisms, and ecological interactions responsible for divergence and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  William J Etges
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Drosophila yakuba mayottensis, a new model for the study of incipient ecological speciation.

Authors:  Amir Yassin
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.160

7.  Genetic analysis of mate discrimination in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Y Chu; E Yang; J M Schinaman; J S Chahda; R Sousa-Neves
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Flexible origin of hydrocarbon/pheromone precursors in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Claude Wicker-Thomas; Damien Garrido; Gwénaëlle Bontonou; Laura Napal; Nicolas Mazuras; Béatrice Denis; Thomas Rubin; Jean-Philippe Parvy; Jacques Montagne
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 9.  Moving Speciation Genetics Forward: Modern Techniques Build on Foundational Studies in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Preadult life history variation determines adult transcriptome expression.

Authors:  William J Etges; Cássia de Oliveira; Subhash Rajpurohit; Allen G Gibbs
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.