Literature DB >> 19653790

Attentional bias is associated with incentive-related physiological and subjective measures.

Andrew J Waters1, Brian L Carter, Jason D Robinson, David W Wetter, Cho Y Lam, William Kerst, Paul M Cinciripini.   

Abstract

Drug cue reactivity is theoretically and clinically important. The modified Stroop task has been widely used to assess attention capture by drug cues (attentional bias). Attentional bias to drug cues is assumed to reflect the incentive value of those cues, but this has not been directly tested. The authors examined whether the smoking Stroop effect was associated with facial electromyography (EMG) assessed in real time. Heart-rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC) responses were also assessed. Smokers (n = 79) attended up to four experimental sessions. Presession Abstinence state and within-session Smoking were manipulated across sessions. Over all assessments, participants exhibited a robust smoking Stroop effect. Using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analyses, the smoking Stroop effect was positively associated with zygomaticus major activity but not with corrugator supercilii activity, HR, or SC. The smoking Stroop effect was also positively associated with self-reported positive outcome expectancies from smoking and with craving. In sum, attentional bias was more strongly associated with appetitive responses (zygomaticus major activity, positive outcome expectancies) than with withdrawal responses (e.g., corrugator supercilii activity) or measures of physiological arousal (e.g., HR, SC). 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19653790      PMCID: PMC4350573          DOI: 10.1037/a0016658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  42 in total

1.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  L S Cox; S T Tiffany; A G Christen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Effects of abstinence and smoking on information processing in adolescent smokers.

Authors:  M Zack; L Belsito; R Scher; T Eissenberg; W A Corrigall
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Selective processing of smoking-related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers on the modified Stroop task.

Authors:  Marcus Munafò; Karin Mogg; Sarah Roberts; Brendan P Bradley; Michael Murphy
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.153

5.  "Paradoxical" effects of smoking on subjective stress versus cardiovascular arousal in males and females.

Authors:  K A Perkins; J E Grobe; C Fonte; M Breus
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Effects of smoking opportunity on cue-elicited urge: a facial coding analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Joan M Wertz; Christopher S Martin; Jeffrey F Cohn; Michael A Perrott; Jill Hobel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research.

Authors:  A J Fridlund; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Effects of cue exposure and deprivation on cognitive resources in smokers.

Authors:  M A Sayette; M R Hufford
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

9.  Appetitive nature of drug cues confirmed with physiological measures in a model using pictures of smoking.

Authors:  A Geier; R F Mucha; P Pauli
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Cognitive-motivational predictors of excessive drinkers' success in changing.

Authors:  W Miles Cox; Emmanuel M Pothos; Steven G Hosier
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.415

View more
  12 in total

1.  Relationship between attentional bias to cocaine-related stimuli and impulsivity in cocaine-dependent subjects.

Authors:  Shijing Liu; Scott D Lane; Joy M Schmitz; Andrew J Waters; Kathryn A Cunningham; F Gerard Moeller
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.829

2.  Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kathryne Van Hedger; Sarah K Keedy; Leah M Mayo; Markus Heilig; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Measures of attentional bias and relational responding are associated with behavioral treatment outcome for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Kenneth M Carpenter; Diana Martinez; Nehal P Vadhan; Dermot Barnes-Holmes; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Cognitive deficits specific to depression-prone smokers during abstinence.

Authors:  Rebecca Ashare; Andrew A Strasser; E Paul Wileyto; Jocelyn Cuevas; Janet Audrain-McGovern
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  The associative basis of cue-elicited drug taking in humans.

Authors:  Lee Hogarth; Anthony Dickinson; Theodora Duka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Cigarette smoking and depression comorbidity: systematic review and proposed theoretical model.

Authors:  Amanda R Mathew; Lee Hogarth; Adam M Leventhal; Jessica W Cook; Brian Hitsman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Neural correlates of attentional bias for smoking cues: modulation by variance in the dopamine transporter gene.

Authors:  Reagan R Wetherill; Kanchana Jagannathan; Falk W Lohoff; Ronald Ehrman; Charles P O'Brien; Anna Rose Childress; Teresa R Franklin
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.280

8.  Attentional bias to smoking and other motivationally relevant cues is affected by nicotine exposure and dose expectancy.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; David G Gilbert; Andrew J Waters; Ellen R Gritz; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.153

9.  Extinction of Conditioned Responses to Methamphetamine-Associated Stimuli in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  Joel S Cavallo; Nicholas A Ruiz; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Attentional and approach biases to alcohol cues among young adult drinkers: An ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Brian Suffoletto; Matt Field; Tammy Chung
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.