Literature DB >> 19653738

A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.

Rebecca Lawson1.   

Abstract

A sequential matching task was used to compare how the difficulty of shape discrimination influences the achievement of object constancy for depth rotations across haptic and visual object recognition. Stimuli were nameable, 3-dimensional plastic models of familiar objects (e.g., bed, chair) and morphs midway between these endpoint shapes (e.g., a bed-chair morph). The 2 objects presented on a trial were either both placed at the same orientation or were rotated by 90 degrees relative to each other. Discrimination difficulty was increased by presenting more similarly shaped objects on mismatch trials (easy: bed, then lizard; medium: bed, then chair; hard: bed, then bed-chair morph). For within-modal visual matching, orientation changes were most disruptive when shape discrimination was hardest. This interaction for 3-dimensional objects replicated the interaction reported in earlier studies presenting 2-dimensional pictures of the same objects (Lawson & Bülthoff, 2008). In contrast, orientation changes and discrimination difficulty had additive effects on within-modal haptic and cross-modal visual-to-haptic matching, whereas cross-modal haptic-to-visual matching was orientation invariant. These results suggest that the cause of orientation sensitivity may differ for visual and haptic object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19653738     DOI: 10.1037/a0015025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

Review 2.  Haptic object perception: spatial dimensionality and relation to vision.

Authors:  Roberta L Klatzky; Susan J Lederman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jonathan B Lin; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multisensory Part-based Representations of Objects in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Quanjing Chen; Frank E Garcea; Bradford Z Mahon; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Using the axis of elongation to align shapes: developmental changes between 18 and 24 months of age.

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Sandra Street; Susan S Jones; Karin H James
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-03-17

6.  Isolating shape from semantics in haptic-visual priming.

Authors:  Ana Pesquita; Allison A Brennan; James T Enns; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Marisa Pappas; Alexandra Kreps; Kevin Lee; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Haptic choice blindness.

Authors:  Catherine Steenfeldt-Kristensen; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-28

9.  Cognitive and tactile factors affecting human haptic performance in later life.

Authors:  Tobias Kalisch; Jan-Christoph Kattenstroth; Rebecca Kowalewski; Martin Tegenthoff; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.

Authors:  Matt Craddock; Rebecca Lawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.