BACKGROUND: Although studies have reported associations between high concentrations of ingested inorganic arsenic and diabetes mellitus, there is no evidence of this association at low exposures. However, a well-publicized study (JAMA. 2008;300:814-822) recently produced an extraordinary finding of a more than 3-fold increase in diabetes at low concentrations of urinary arsenic. This potentially affects 40 million adults in the United States. METHODS: We used the same cross-sectional data on urinary arsenic and type 2 diabetes mellitus in 795 adults from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to assess this evidence. RESULTS: As in the earlier study, we found an odds ratio (OR) near 1.0 for diabetes, comparing the 80th versus 20th percentiles of urinary total arsenic (OR = 0.88 [95% confidence interval = 0.39-1.97]). This OR increased to above 3.0 when urinary arsenobetaine was added to the logistic risk model. However, this high OR was a statistical artifact because arsenobetaine, which is ingested from fish and is essentially nontoxic, is a part of measured total urinary arsenic. These 2 variables are highly correlated (correlation = 0.80). Because arsenobetaine is a part of total arsenic, it should first be subtracted from total arsenic rather than being added to the statistical model. Doing so yields an OR of 1.15 (0.53-2.50). CONCLUSION: These findings show no evidence of increased risk of diabetes with arsenic exposure in this dataset. This underscores the importance of valid statistical techniques and careful consideration of scientific plausibility when investigating low-concentration chemical exposures.
BACKGROUND: Although studies have reported associations between high concentrations of ingested inorganic arsenic and diabetes mellitus, there is no evidence of this association at low exposures. However, a well-publicized study (JAMA. 2008;300:814-822) recently produced an extraordinary finding of a more than 3-fold increase in diabetes at low concentrations of urinary arsenic. This potentially affects 40 million adults in the United States. METHODS: We used the same cross-sectional data on urinary arsenic and type 2 diabetes mellitus in 795 adults from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to assess this evidence. RESULTS: As in the earlier study, we found an odds ratio (OR) near 1.0 for diabetes, comparing the 80th versus 20th percentiles of urinary total arsenic (OR = 0.88 [95% confidence interval = 0.39-1.97]). This OR increased to above 3.0 when urinary arsenobetaine was added to the logistic risk model. However, this high OR was a statistical artifact because arsenobetaine, which is ingested from fish and is essentially nontoxic, is a part of measured total urinary arsenic. These 2 variables are highly correlated (correlation = 0.80). Because arsenobetaine is a part of total arsenic, it should first be subtracted from total arsenic rather than being added to the statistical model. Doing so yields an OR of 1.15 (0.53-2.50). CONCLUSION: These findings show no evidence of increased risk of diabetes with arsenic exposure in this dataset. This underscores the importance of valid statistical techniques and careful consideration of scientific plausibility when investigating low-concentration chemical exposures.
Authors: Wen-Chi Pan; Wei Jie Seow; Molly L Kile; Elaine B Hoffman; Quazi Quamruzzaman; Mahmuder Rahman; Golam Mahiuddin; Golam Mostofa; Quan Lu; David C Christiani Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kristin N Harper; Xinhua Liu; Megan N Hall; Vesna Ilievski; Julie Oka; Larissa Calancie; Vesna Slavkovich; Diane Levy; Abu Siddique; Shafiul Alam; Jacob L Mey; Alexander van Geen; Joseph H Graziano; Mary V Gamble Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Maria Grau-Perez; Ana Navas-Acien; Inmaculada Galan-Chilet; Laisa S Briongos-Figuero; David Morchon-Simon; Jose D Bermudez; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Griselda de Marco; Pilar Rentero-Garrido; Tamara Garcia-Barrera; Jose L Gomez-Ariza; Jose A Casasnovas; Juan C Martin-Escudero; Josep Redon; F Javier Chaves; Maria Tellez-Plaza Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Matthew O Gribble; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans; Nawar M Shara; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Ellen K Silbergeld; Eliseo Guallar; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Miranda J Spratlen; Maria Grau-Perez; Lyle G Best; Joseph Yracheta; Mariana Lazo; Dhananjay Vaidya; Poojitha Balakrishnan; Mary V Gamble; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Shelley A Cole; Jason G Umans; Barbara V Howard; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897