PURPOSE: Although, for patients with cancer, comorbidity can affect the timing of cancer detection, treatment, and prognosis, there is little information relating to the question of whether the choice of comorbidity index affects the results of studies. Therefore, to compare the association of comorbidity with mortality after surgery for colon cancer, this study evaluated the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comorbidity Index, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of colon cancer patients (N = 496) who underwent surgery at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital from 1981 to 2002. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were obtained using the method of Cox proportional hazards for the three comorbidity indices in predicting overall and colon cancer-specific mortality. The point estimates obtained for comorbidity and other risk factors across the three models were compared. RESULTS: For each index, the highest comorbidity burden was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (ACE-27: HR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.15; NIA/NCI: HR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.61; CCI: HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.88) as well as colon cancer-specific survival. For the other risk factors, there was little variation in the point estimates across the three models. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from these three indices were strikingly similar. For patients with severe comorbidity, all three indices were statistically significant in predicting shorter survival after surgery for colon cancer.
PURPOSE: Although, for patients with cancer, comorbidity can affect the timing of cancer detection, treatment, and prognosis, there is little information relating to the question of whether the choice of comorbidity index affects the results of studies. Therefore, to compare the association of comorbidity with mortality after surgery for colon cancer, this study evaluated the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comorbidity Index, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of colon cancerpatients (N = 496) who underwent surgery at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital from 1981 to 2002. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were obtained using the method of Cox proportional hazards for the three comorbidity indices in predicting overall and colon cancer-specific mortality. The point estimates obtained for comorbidity and other risk factors across the three models were compared. RESULTS: For each index, the highest comorbidity burden was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (ACE-27: HR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.15; NIA/NCI: HR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.61; CCI: HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.88) as well as colon cancer-specific survival. For the other risk factors, there was little variation in the point estimates across the three models. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from these three indices were strikingly similar. For patients with severe comorbidity, all three indices were statistically significant in predicting shorter survival after surgery for colon cancer.
Authors: D J Sargent; R M Goldberg; S D Jacobson; J S Macdonald; R Labianca; D G Haller; L E Shepherd; J F Seitz; G Francini Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joy H Lewis; Meredith L Kilgore; Dana P Goldman; Edward L Trimble; Richard Kaplan; Michael J Montello; Michael G Housman; José J Escarce Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert B Hines; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; John W Waterbor; Gerald McGwin; Ellen Funkhouser; Christopher S Coffey; James Posey; Upender Manne Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stefano Marventano; Giuseppe Grosso; Antonio Mistretta; Marta Bogusz-Czerniewicz; Roberta Ferranti; Francesca Nolfo; Gabriele Giorgianni; Stefania Rametta; Filippo Drago; Francesco Basile; Antonio Biondi Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Chai Hong Rim; Won Sup Yoon; Jung Ae Lee; Dae Sik Yang; Nam Kwon Lee; Young Je Park; Chul Yong Kim Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Hanna K Sanoff; William R Carpenter; Christopher F Martin; Daniel J Sargent; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Til Stürmer; Jason P Fine; Jane Weeks; Joyce Niland; Katherine L Kahn; Maria J Schymura; Deborah Schrag Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Valentin Goede; Paula Cramer; Raymonde Busch; Manuela Bergmann; Martina Stauch; Georg Hopfinger; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Hartmut Döhner; Anne Westermann; Clemens M Wendtner; Barbara Eichhorst; Michael Hallek Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: William Paul Skelton; Hiral Parekh; Jason S Starr; Jose Trevino; Jessica Cioffi; Steven Hughes; Thomas J George Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2018-03
Authors: Kenneth G Nepple; Andrew J Stephenson; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jeff Michalski; Robert L Grubb; Seth A Strope; Jennifer Haslag-Minoff; Jay F Piccirillo; Jay P Ciezki; Eric A Klein; Chandana A Reddy; Changhong Yu; Michael W Kattan; Adam S Kibel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 20.096