Literature DB >> 19651356

Stability of immediately loaded 3- and 6-mm miniscrew implants in beagle dogs--a pilot study.

Micah G Mortensen1, Peter H Buschang, Donald R Oliver, Hee-Moon Kyung, Rolf G Behrents.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared the stability of 3- and 6-mm long miniscrew implants (MSIs) loaded with orthopedic force levels.
METHODS: Using a split-mouth experimental design, we placed MSIs into the jaws of 5 mature beagle dogs and immediately loaded them for 6 weeks. Continuous forces were applied by reciprocally loading pairs of MSIs with nickel-titanium coil springs. The mandibles had the 3-mm MSIs randomly loaded with forces of 600 or 900 g. In the maxilla, the 3- and 6-mm MSIs were randomly assigned and loaded with 600 g of force. An unloaded, control MSI was placed in each quadrant. Overall success was defined as MSIs that remained intact; net success rates excluded MSIs that had sheared off and all implants placed in a dog that frequently chewed his run bars and food bowl.
RESULTS: The overall success rates of the loaded and the control 6-mm MSIs were 100%. Overall and net success rates for the 3-mm experimental MSIs were 66.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Similarly, the overall and net success rates of the 3-mm control MSIs were 66.7% and 81.8%, respectively. The overall success rates of the 3-mm mandibular MSIs loaded with 900 and 600 g of force were both 60%; their net success rates were 100% with 900 g and 85.7% with 600 g. Overall success rates of the 3-mm experimental MSIs in the maxilla and the mandible were 80% and 60%, repectively. The net success rates were 100% (maxilla) and 85.7% (mandible). There were no significant (P > 0.05) differences in stability associated with force or location. The loaded 3- and 6-mm MSI pairs demonstrated significant decreases in interimplant distance, averaging 2.2 and 1.8 mm, respectively; the 3-mm MSIs loaded with 900 g showed significantly more displacement than those loaded with 600 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Success rates of immediately loaded 3-mm MSIs were significantly lower than those of immediately loaded 6-mm MSIs. Neither force nor location explained differences in the success rates. The linear displacements of the MSIs were associated with load amount rather than implant length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651356     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Laser-treated stainless steel mini-screw implants: 3D surface roughness, bone-implant contact, and fracture resistance analysis.

Authors:  He-Kyong Kang; Tien-Min Chu; Paul Dechow; Kelton Stewart; Hee-Moon Kyung; Sean Shih-Yao Liu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Direct versus indirect loading of orthodontic miniscrew implants-an FEM analysis.

Authors:  C Holberg; P Winterhalder; N Holberg; I Rudzki-Janson; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Stability of smooth and rough mini-implants: clinical and biomechanical evaluation - an in vivostudy.

Authors:  Giselle Naback Lemes Vilani; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Carlos Nelson Elias; Cláudia Trindade Mattos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015-10

4.  Factors affecting stresses in cortical bone around miniscrew implants: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Ramzi Duaibis; Budi Kusnoto; Raghu Natarajan; Linping Zhao; Carla Evans
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength.

Authors:  Ankit H Shah; Rolf G Behrents; Ki Beom Kim; Hee-Moon Kyung; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Jörg Handschel; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.344

7.  Investigation of the optimal design of orthodontic mini-implants based on the primary stability: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amir Hooman Sadr Haghighi; Vahid Pouyafar; Ali Navid; Mahsa Eskandarinezhad; Tannaz Abdollahzadeh Baghaei
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019-08-14

8.  Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study.

Authors:  Sérgio Estelita Barros; Viviane Vanz; Kelly Chiqueto; Guilherme Janson; Eduardo Ferreira
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Stability of immediately loaded 3 mm long miniscrew implants: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Danielle Geshay; Phillip Campbell; Larry Tadlock; Emet Schneiderman; Hee-Moon Kyung; Peter Buschang
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.