Literature DB >> 19651261

Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Gerben DeJong1, Ching-Hui Hsieh, Julie Gassaway, Susan D Horn, Randall J Smout, Koen Putman, Roberta James, Michael Brown, Elizabeth M Newman, Mary P Foley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in 3 types of postacute facilities in the U.S.
DESIGN: Multi-site prospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: Eight freestanding skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), 1 hospital-based SNF, and 11 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2158) with knee or hip replacement.
INTERVENTIONS: No new interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay (LOS), amount and intensity of physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT), types of therapy activities.
RESULTS: Average LOS was about 15 days for freestanding SNF patients, and 9 to 10 days for hospital-based SNF and IRF patients. Freestanding SNFs and IRFs provide about the same number of hours of PT and OT; the hospital-based SNF provided 27% fewer hours. Freestanding SNFs and the hospital-based SNF provided fewer hours a day than did IRFs. Joint replacement patients across all 3 types of facilities spent, on average, 70% to 75% of their PT time in just 2 activities--exercise and gait and spent 56% to 66% of their OT time in 3 activities--exercise, functional mobility, and dressing lower body.
CONCLUSIONS: Both freestanding SNFs and IRFs provided similar amounts of PT with a similar emphasis on exercise and gait activities. IRFs, however, provided more OT than freestanding SNFs. IRFs had shorter LOSs and more intensive therapy services than freestanding SNFs. Study freestanding SNFs exhibited greater variation in LOS and intensity of therapy than IRFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19651261     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  18 in total

1.  Physical therapy activities in stroke, knee arthroplasty, and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: their variation, similarities, and association with functional outcomes.

Authors:  Gerben DeJong; Ching-Hui Hsieh; Koen Putman; Randall J Smout; Susan D Horn; Wenqiang Tian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Marcel P Dijkers; John Whyte; Tessa Hart; Lyn S Turkstra; Jeanne M Zanca; Christine Chen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Disparities in post-acute rehabilitation care for joint replacement.

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Li-Jung E Ku; Malcolm P Cutchin; Kendra Heatwole-Shank; Lloyd J Edwards
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Performance-based outcomes of inpatient rehabilitation facilities treating hip fracture patients in the United States.

Authors:  Michael P Cary; Marianne Baernholdt; Ruth A Anderson; Elizabeth I Merwin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Changes in Discharge to Rehabilitation: Potential Unintended Consequences of Medicare Total Hip Arthroplasty/Total Knee Arthroplasty Bundled Payments, Should They Be Implemented on a Nationwide Scale?

Authors:  Cheryl K Zogg; Jason R Falvey; Justin B Dimick; Adil H Haider; Kimberly A Davis; Johnathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Postacute rehabilitation care for hip fracture: who gets the most care?

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Li-Jung E Ku
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Trajectories in functional recovery for patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation for unilateral hip or knee replacement.

Authors:  Saad M Bindawas; James E Graham; Amol M Karmarkar; Nai-Wei Chen; Carl V Granger; Paulette Niewczyk; Margret A DiVita; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  Occupational, Physical, and Speech Therapy Treatment Activities During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Cynthia L Beaulieu; Marcel P Dijkers; Ryan S Barrett; Susan D Horn; Clare G Giuffrida; Misti L Timpson; Deborah M Carroll; Randy J Smout; Flora M Hammond
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke.

Authors:  Leighton Chan; M Elizabeth Sandel; Alan M Jette; Jed Appelman; Diane E Brandt; Pengfei Cheng; Marian Teselle; Richard Delmonico; Joseph F Terdiman; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Regional variation in stroke rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy A Reistetter; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Karl Eschbach; Yong-Fang Kuo; Carl V Granger; Jean Freeman; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.