Literature DB >> 19649156

Analysis of the fitness effect of compensatory mutations.

Liqing Zhang, Layne T Watson.   

Abstract

This paper extends previous work on the Darwinian evolutionary fitness effect of the fixation of deleterious mutations by incorporating compensatory mutations, which are mutations (deleterious by themselves) that ameliorate other deleterious mutations, thus reducing the genetic load of populations. Since having compensatory mutations essentially changes the distributional shapes of deleterious mutations, the effect of compensatory mutations is studied by comparing distributions of deleterious mutations without compensatory mutations to those with compensatory mutations. The effect of effective population size (N(e)), fitness distributional shape, and mutation rate on population fitness reduction is studied. Results indicate that, first, the smaller a population's N(e), the larger the effect of compensatory mutations on fitness recovery, and the compensatory effect increases sharply with decreasing N(e). Second, the larger the squared coefficient of variation in the fitness effect of deleterious mutations, the larger the effect of compensatory mutations. Third, for fixed N(e), the higher the rate of deleterious mutations, the more effective compensatory mutation is in fitness recovery, and this effect is more pronounced for smaller N(e).

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19649156      PMCID: PMC2689613          DOI: 10.2976/1.2990075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HFSP J        ISSN: 1955-205X


  23 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Endosymbiotic bacteria: groEL buffers against deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Mario A Fares; Mario X Ruiz-González; Andrés Moya; Santiago F Elena; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  L L Vassilieva; A M Hook; M Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.

Authors:  Gwenaël Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6.

Authors:  C L Burch; L Chao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Functional origins of fitness effect-sizes of compensatory mutations in the DNA bacteriophage phiX174.

Authors:  Art F Y Poon; Lin Chao
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Note on the computation of critical effective population sizes.

Authors:  Liqing Zhang; Layne T Watson
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations.

Authors:  A Poon; S P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Compensatory mutations cause excess of antagonistic epistasis in RNA secondary structure folding.

Authors:  Claus O Wilke; Richard E Lenski; Christoph Adami
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions.

Authors:  Misha Soskine; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  The genomic basis of adaptation to the fitness cost of rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Qin Qi; Macarena Toll-Riera; Karl Heilbron; Gail M Preston; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.