Literature DB >> 19648935

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results of 126 patients with a minimum 3-year follow-up at a single Chinese institute.

Xin Gao1, Jian-Hua Zhou, Liao-Yuan Li, Jian-Guang Qiu, Xiao-Yong Pu.   

Abstract

In this study we evaluate the oncological and functional results of the largest cohort of patients in China treated by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and with at least 3 years of follow-up. 126 inconsecutive patients (range 56-78 years, median 62.5) who had an LRP were retrospectively analyzed. The mean prostate specific antigen level and Gleason score was 13.4 ng mL(-1) and 6.4, respectively. Twenty-seven patients had unilateral or bilateral nerve preservation and 29 had pelvic lymphadenectomy. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for differences in clinical and pathological features when comparing the risk for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). Urinary continence was assessed by incontinence questionnaire and erectile function by the Sexual Health Inventory for Men score. The mean operative duration was 250 min and blood loss 354 mL. Five patients received blood transfusion and nine had complications, including rectal injury (two), ureteral injury (one), active bleeding (one), bladder neck stenosis (two), paralytic ileus (one), subcutaneous hematoma (one) and port-site hernia (one). The overall positive surgical margin rate was 20.6% and correlated with pathological stage and Gleason score respectively (P = 0.03, P < 0.001 respectively). All patients had >or= 3 years of follow-up (range 3-6.75 years, mean 4.6, median 4.75). At 3 years of follow-up, the overall survival rate was 100% and the bPFS was 81.0% in all patients; 124 patients (98.4%) were continent; 22 of 27 patients (81.5%) who underwent nerve preservation retained erectile function. Our series confirms that LRP is an effective, safe and precise technique at Chinese institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19648935      PMCID: PMC3735014          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2009.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  36 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; H el-Fettouh; H Baumert; X Cathelineau; J D Doublet; G Fromont; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. preliminary pathologic evaluation.

Authors:  Gaëalle Fromont; Bertrand Guillonneau; Pierre Validire; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Re: Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Jiang-Guang Qiu; Bing Zhang; Yu-Bing Cai; Liang-Qin Hong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Positive margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective study of 100 cases performed by 4 different surgeons.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Feel; John W Davis; Serdar Deger; Jan Roigas; Andreas H Wille; Dietmar Schnorr; Amr Abdel Hakiem; Stefan Loening; Ingolf A Tuerk
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Benjamin J Challacombe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  James A Brown; Christopher Garlitz; Leonard G Gomella; Scott G Hubosky; Stuart M Diamond; David McGinnis; Stephen E Strup
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Gerald W Hull; Farhang Rabbani; Farhat Abbas; Thomas M Wheeler; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Use of multiple imputation to correct for nonresponse bias in a survey of urologic symptoms among African-American men.

Authors:  Jeremy M G Taylor; Kristine L Cooper; John T Wei; Aruna V Sarma; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Steve G Heeringa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Alexandre de la Taille; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Fabien Saint; Safawat Zaki; Dimitrios Vordos; Antony Cicco; L Eric Olsson; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  4 in total

1.  Single-centre study comparing standard apical dissection with a modified technique to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Xiao-Yong Pu; Jie Si-Tu; Wen-Tao Huang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Younger patients have poorer biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Jung Soo Nam; Woong Na; Jong Jin Oh; Cheol Yong Yoon; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyun June Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Continuous suture of a single absorbable suture: a new simplified vesicourethral anastomosis technique in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Peng-fei Shao; Qiang Lv; Ning-hong Song; Jie Li; Wei Zhang; Pu Li; Li-xin Hua; Chang-jun Yin
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

4.  Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score.

Authors:  Xin-Hai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Klaus Jung; Hong-Biao Lu; Natalia Leva; Ahmed Magheli; Carsten Stephan; Jonas Busch
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.