OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of a 2-week course of lopinavir-ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of the triglyceride-lowering agent, gemfibrozil. METHODS: The study was conducted as an open label, single-sequence pharmacokinetic study in healthy human volunteers. Gemfibrozil pharmacokinetic parameter values were compared using a Student t test after a single 600-mg dose was administered to healthy volunteers before and after 2 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily. RESULTS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (eight males) completed the study. All study drugs were generally well tolerated and no subjects withdrew participation. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for gemfibrozil area under the plasma concentration-time curve after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir compared with baseline was 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) (P < 0.001). All 15 study subjects experienced a reduction in gemfibrozil area under the plasma concentration-time curve after lopinavir-ritonavir (range, -6% to -74%). The geometric mean ratios for gemfibrozil apparent oral clearance and maximum concentration were 1.69 (1.41, 1.97) and 0.67 (0.49, 0.86) after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir versus baseline, respectively (P < 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Gemfibrozil elimination half-life did not change after lopinavir-ritonavir administration (P = 0.60). CONCLUSION: Lopinavir-ritonavir significantly reduced the systemic exposure of gemfibrozil by reducing gemfibrozil absorption. Clinicians treating HIV-infected patients with hypertriglyceridemia should be aware of this drug interaction.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of a 2-week course of lopinavir-ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of the triglyceride-lowering agent, gemfibrozil. METHODS: The study was conducted as an open label, single-sequence pharmacokinetic study in healthy human volunteers. Gemfibrozil pharmacokinetic parameter values were compared using a Student t test after a single 600-mg dose was administered to healthy volunteers before and after 2 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily. RESULTS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (eight males) completed the study. All study drugs were generally well tolerated and no subjects withdrew participation. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) for gemfibrozil area under the plasma concentration-time curve after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir compared with baseline was 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) (P < 0.001). All 15 study subjects experienced a reduction in gemfibrozil area under the plasma concentration-time curve after lopinavir-ritonavir (range, -6% to -74%). The geometric mean ratios for gemfibrozil apparent oral clearance and maximum concentration were 1.69 (1.41, 1.97) and 0.67 (0.49, 0.86) after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir versus baseline, respectively (P < 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). Gemfibrozil elimination half-life did not change after lopinavir-ritonavir administration (P = 0.60). CONCLUSION:Lopinavir-ritonavir significantly reduced the systemic exposure of gemfibrozil by reducing gemfibrozil absorption. Clinicians treating HIV-infectedpatients with hypertriglyceridemia should be aware of this drug interaction.
Authors: Manon J van der Lee; Lara Dawood; Hadewych J M ter Hofstede; Marga J A de Graaff-Teulen; Eleonora W J van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer; Nurcan Caliskan-Yassen; Peter P Koopmans; David M Burger Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: H Glaeser; D G Bailey; G K Dresser; J C Gregor; U I Schwarz; J S McGrath; E Jolicoeur; W Lee; B F Leake; R G Tirona; R B Kim Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Andrew Rowland; David J Elliot; J Andrew Williams; Peter I Mackenzie; Ronald G Dickinson; John O Miners Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2006-03-24 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: R Jones; S Sawleshwarkar; C Michailidis; A Jackson; S Mandalia; J Stebbing; M Bower; M Nelson; B G Gazzard; G J Moyle Journal: HIV Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Joseph E Rower; Lane R Bushman; Kyle P Hammond; Rajendra S Kadam; Christina L Aquilante Journal: Biomed Chromatogr Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Lori A Gordon; Christine Y Malati; Colleen Hadigan; Mary McLaughlin; Raul M Alfaro; Mónica M Calderón; Joseph A Kovacs; Scott R Penzak Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: Monica A Muñoz; Wei Liu; Joseph A C Delaney; Elizabeth Brown; Michael J Mugavero; W Chris Mathews; Sonia Napravnik; James H Willig; Joseph J Eron; Peter W Hunt; James O Kahn; Michael S Saag; Mari M Kitahata; Heidi M Crane Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Marie N S Gendy; Patricia Di Ciano; William J Kowalczyk; Sean P Barrett; Tony P George; Stephen Heishman; Bernard Le Foll Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna Herminghaus; Eric Laser; Jan Schulz; Richard Truse; Christian Vollmer; Inge Bauer; Olaf Picker Journal: Cells Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 6.600