Lori A Gordon1, Christine Y Malati1, Colleen Hadigan2, Mary McLaughlin2, Raul M Alfaro1, Mónica M Calderón1, Joseph A Kovacs3, Scott R Penzak1. 1. Pharmacy Department, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Critical Care Medicine Department, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Because we previously observed a significant 41% reduction in gemfibrozil exposure after 2 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir administration, we sought to determine the influence of lopinavir-ritonavir and ritonavir alone on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid, an alternative to gemfibrozil for the treatment of elevated triglyceride levels. DESIGN: Open-label, single-sequence pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Clinical Research Center at the National Institutes of Health. SUBJECTS: Thirteen healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTION: Subjects received a single oral dose of fenofibrate 145 mg during three study phases: before ritonavir administration, after 2 weeks of administration of ritonavir 100 mg twice/day, and after 2 weeks of administration of lopinavir 400 mg-ritonavir 100 mg twice/day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were collected over 120 hours for determination of fenofibric acid concentrations. Fenofibric acid pharmacokinetic parameter values were compared before and after concomitant ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir administration. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for fenofibric acid area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 0.89 (0.77-1.01) after 14 days of ritonavir alone compared with baseline (p>0.05) and 0.87 (0.69-1.05) after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir compared with baseline (p>0.05). Study drugs were generally well tolerated; all adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and resolved without intervention. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a significant interaction between gemfibrozil and lopinavir-ritonavir, neither lopinavir-ritonavir nor ritonavir alone altered the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid in healthy volunteers. These data suggest that fenofibrate remains an important option in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving common ritonavir-boosted therapy.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Because we previously observed a significant 41% reduction in gemfibrozil exposure after 2 weeks of lopinavir-ritonavir administration, we sought to determine the influence of lopinavir-ritonavir and ritonavir alone on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid, an alternative to gemfibrozil for the treatment of elevated triglyceride levels. DESIGN: Open-label, single-sequence pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Clinical Research Center at the National Institutes of Health. SUBJECTS: Thirteen healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTION: Subjects received a single oral dose of fenofibrate 145 mg during three study phases: before ritonavir administration, after 2 weeks of administration of ritonavir 100 mg twice/day, and after 2 weeks of administration of lopinavir 400 mg-ritonavir 100 mg twice/day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were collected over 120 hours for determination of fenofibric acid concentrations. Fenofibric acid pharmacokinetic parameter values were compared before and after concomitant ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir administration. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for fenofibric acid area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 0.89 (0.77-1.01) after 14 days of ritonavir alone compared with baseline (p>0.05) and 0.87 (0.69-1.05) after 14 days of lopinavir-ritonavir compared with baseline (p>0.05). Study drugs were generally well tolerated; all adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and resolved without intervention. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a significant interaction between gemfibrozil and lopinavir-ritonavir, neither lopinavir-ritonavir nor ritonavir alone altered the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid in healthy volunteers. These data suggest that fenofibrate remains an important option in humanimmunodeficiency virus-infectedpatients receiving common ritonavir-boosted therapy.
Authors: Donglu Zhang; Theodore J Chando; Donald W Everett; Christopher J Patten; Shangara S Dehal; W Griffith Humphreys Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: D Ouellet; A Hsu; J Qian; C S Locke; C J Eason; J H Cavanaugh; J M Leonard; G R Granneman Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Manon J van der Lee; Lara Dawood; Hadewych J M ter Hofstede; Marga J A de Graaff-Teulen; Eleonora W J van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer; Nurcan Caliskan-Yassen; Peter P Koopmans; David M Burger Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: R Douglas Bruce; David E Moody; Wenfang B Fang; Diane Chodkowski; Laurie Andrews; Gerald H Friedland Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: D M Burger; A Huisman; N Van Ewijk; H Neisingh; P Van Uden; G A Rongen; P Koopmans; R J Bertz Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Michael J Silverberg; Wendy Leyden; Leo Hurley; Alan S Go; Charles P Quesenberry; Daniel Klein; Michael A Horberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sonu Abraham; Anju Nohria; Tomas G Neilan; Aarti Asnani; Anu Mariam Saji; Jui Shah; Tara Lech; Jason Grossman; George M Abraham; Daniel P McQuillen; David T Martin; Paul E Sax; Sourbha S Dani; Sarju Ganatra Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 27.203
Authors: Martial Caillaud; Nipa H Patel; Wisam Toma; Alyssa White; Danielle Thompson; Jared Mann; Tammy H Tran; Jane L Roberts; Justin L Poklis; John W Bigbee; Xianjun Fang; David A Gewirtz; M Imad Damaj Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 6.639