Literature DB >> 19648414

Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings.

David Lentink1, Michael H Dickinson.   

Abstract

Organisms that swim or fly with fins or wings physically interact with the surrounding water and air. The interactions are governed by the morphology and kinematics of the locomotory system that form boundary conditions to the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations. These equations represent Newton's law of motion for the fluid surrounding the organism. Several dimensionless numbers, such as the Reynolds number and Strouhal number, measure the influence of morphology and kinematics on the fluid dynamics of swimming and flight. There exists, however, no coherent theoretical framework that shows how such dimensionless numbers of organisms are linked to the NS equation. Here we present an integrated approach to scale the biological fluid dynamics of a wing that flaps, spins or translates. Both the morphology and kinematics of the locomotory system are coupled to the NS equation through which we find dimensionless numbers that represent rotational accelerations in the flow due to wing kinematics and morphology. The three corresponding dimensionless numbers are (1) the angular acceleration number, (2) the centripetal acceleration number, and (3) the Rossby number, which measures Coriolis acceleration. These dimensionless numbers consist of length scale ratios, which facilitate their geometric interpretation. This approach gives fundamental insight into the physical mechanisms that explain the differences in performance among flapping, spinning and translating wings. Although we derived this new framework for the special case of a model fly wing, the method is general enough to make it applicable to other organisms that fly or swim using wings or fins.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19648414     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.022251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Lift enhancement by bats' dynamically changing wingspan.

Authors:  Shizhao Wang; Xing Zhang; Guowei He; Tianshu Liu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Vortex interactions with flapping wings and fins can be unpredictable.

Authors:  David Lentink; Gertjan F Van Heijst; Florian T Muijres; Johan L Van Leeuwen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Scaling of the performance of insect-inspired passive-pitching flapping wings.

Authors:  Kit Sum Wu; Jerome Nowak; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Broadley; Mostafa R A Nabawy; Mark K Quinn; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

6.  Normalized lift: an energy interpretation of the lift coefficient simplifies comparisons of the lifting ability of rotating and flapping surfaces.

Authors:  Phillip Burgers; David E Alexander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Petiolate wings: effects on the leading-edge vortex in flapping flight.

Authors:  Nathan Phillips; Kevin Knowles; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  The biomechanical origin of extreme wing allometry in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Dimitri A Skandalis; Paolo S Segre; Joseph W Bahlman; Derrick J E Groom; Kenneth C Welch; Christopher C Witt; Jimmy A McGuire; Robert Dudley; David Lentink; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.