Literature DB >> 19647634

Skin dose impact from vacuum immobilization device and carbon fiber couch in intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Kuo-Wei Lee1, Jian-Kuen Wu, Shiu-Chen Jeng, Yen-Wan Hsueh Liu, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng.   

Abstract

To investigate the unexpected skin dose increase from intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on vacuum cushions and carbon-fiber couches and then to modify the dosimetric plan accordingly. Eleven prostate cancer patients undergoing IMRT were treated in prone position with a vacuum cushion. Two under-couch beams scattered the radiation from the vacuum cushion and carbon-fiber couch. The IMRT plans with both devices contoured were compared with the plans not contouring them. The skin doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) placed on the inguinal regions in a single IMRT fraction. Tissue equivalent thickness was transformed for both devices with the relative densities. The TLD-measured skin doses (59.5 +/- 9.5 cGy and 55.6 +/- 5.9 cGy at left and right inguinal regions, respectively) were significantly higher than the calculated doses (28.7 +/- 4.7 cGy; p = 2.2 x 10(-5) and 26.2 +/- 4.3 cGy; p = 1.5 x 10(-5)) not contouring the vacuum cushion and carbon-fiber couch. The calculated skin doses with both devices contoured (59.1 +/- 8.8 cGy and 55.5 +/- 5.7 cGy) were similar to the TLD-measured doses. In addition, the calculated skin doses using the vacuum cushion and a converted thickness of the simulator couch were no different from the TLD-measured doses. The recalculated doses of rectum and bladder did not change significantly. The dose that covered 95% of target volume was less than the prescribed dose in 4 of 11 patients, and this problem was solved after re-optimization applying the corrected contours. The vacuum cushion and carbon-fiber couch contributed to increased skin doses. The tissue-equivalent-thickness method served as an effective way to correct the dose variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19647634     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2008.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  9 in total

1.  Verification of the dose attenuation of a newly developed vacuum cushion for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Toru Takakura; Yoshiyuki Ito; Akinori Higashikawa; Tomohiro Nishiyama; Takashi Sakamoto
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-06-03

2.  Reduction of Potential Risk for Skin Toxicity in Megavoltage Radiotherapy Using a Novel Rigid Couch.

Authors:  Mikoto Tamura; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Masahiko Okumura; Hiroshi Doi; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Increased beam attenuation and surface dose by different couch inserts of treatment tables used in megavoltage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jan K H Seppälä; Jarmo A J Kulmala
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Characterization of dose impact on IMRT and VMAT from couch attenuation for two Varian couches.

Authors:  Heng Li; Andrew K Lee; Jennifer L Johnson; Ronald X Zhu; Rajat J Kudchadker
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  An Update of Couch Effect on the Attenuation of Megavoltage Radiotherapy Beam and the Variation of Absorbed Dose in the Build-up Region.

Authors:  T Sedaghatian; M Momennezhad; S H Rasta; Y Makhdoomi; S Abdollahian
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Dosimetric effects of immobilization devices on SABR for lung cancer using VMAT technique.

Authors:  Jong In Park; Sung-Joon Ye; Hak Jae Kim; Jong Min Park
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Dosimetric Effects of Head and Neck Immobilization Devices on Multi-field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Li Chen; Ying-Lin Peng; Shi-Yong Gu; Hui Shen; Dan-Dan Zhang; Wen-Zhao Sun; Jian-Hua Wu; Xiao-Wu Deng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Dosimetric effects of supine immobilization devices on the skin in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ran Lv; Guangyi Yang; Yongzhi Huang; Yanhong Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A simple method to account for skin dose enhancement during treatment planning of VMAT treatments of patients in contact with immobilization equipment.

Authors:  James Rijken; Tanya Kairn; Scott Crowe; Luis Muñoz; Jamie Trapp
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.