| Literature DB >> 19646286 |
Yohei Shinfuku1, Natee Sorpitiporn, Masahiro Sono, Chikara Furusawa, Takashi Hirasawa, Hiroshi Shimizu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In silico genome-scale metabolic models enable the analysis of the characteristics of metabolic systems of organisms. In this study, we reconstructed a genome-scale metabolic model of Corynebacterium glutamicum on the basis of genome sequence annotation and physiological data. The metabolic characteristics were analyzed using flux balance analysis (FBA), and the results of FBA were validated using data from culture experiments performed at different oxygen uptake rates.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19646286 PMCID: PMC2728707 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Figure 1Changes in the yields of organic acids, biomass, and carbon dioxide on changing OUR/GUR ratio. (a) Summary of experimental results and predictions by FBA simulations. The unit of GUR, OUR, and production rates of CO2, lactate, acetate, succinate, and biomass are mmol/gDW/h. The values in parentheses represent carbon yields. Simulation results which were obtained by using the same GUR and OUR are also presented. (b) A scatter plot of carbon yield. The x-axis corresponds to the result of FBA simulation, while the y-axis show the experimentally observed carbon yield. The carbon yields in the 5 sets of experimental and simulation results are presented. The line corresponding to y = x is also included.
Genomic features and characteristics of a reconstructed metabolic model of C. glutamicum ATCC 13032.
| Feature | Property |
| Genome length | 3282708 bp |
| G+C content | 53.80% |
| No. of open reading frames (ORFs) | 3432 |
| Total coding sequences (CDS) | 3002 |
| CDS encoding annotated proteins | 2489 |
| No. of genes included | 277 |
| No. of associated reactions | 428 |
| No. of other reactions | 74 |
| No. of metabolites | 423 |
| No. of internal fluxes | 470 |
| No. of exchange fluxes | 32 |
The genomic features of C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 shown here were reported by Kalinowski et al. [33].
Functional classification of metabolic reactions in a C. glutamicum genome-scale model.
| glycolysis/gluconeogenesis | 18 | arabinogalactan biosynthesis | 2 |
| TCA cycle | 17 | dTDP-rhamnose biosynthesis | 5 |
| pentose phosphate pathway | 8 | D-lactate metabolism | 5 |
| Entner-Doudoroff pathway | 2 | GDP-mannose metabolism | 5 |
| glycerol and glycerophosphodiester degradation | 2 | ||
| mevalonate pathway | 9 | ||
| fatty acid biosynthesis | 15 | UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine biosynthesis | 7 |
| phospholipid biosynthesis | 17 | UDP-glucose conversion | 3 |
| isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthesis | 8 | ||
| PRPP biosynthesis | 1 | glutathione redox reactions | 4 |
| purinebiosynthesis | 29 | myo-inositol biosynthesis | 2 |
| pyrimidine biosynthesis | 23 | Polysaccharide biosynthesis | 1 |
| nucleotide salvage pathway | 31 | peptidoglycan biosynthesis | |
| 13 | |||
| glutamate biosynthesis | 2 | MAPc biosynthesis | 1 |
| glutamine biosynthesis | 1 | PIM2 biosynthesis | 2 |
| alanine biosynthesis | 3 | Mycolyl-ACP biosynthesis | 1 |
| valine biosynthesis | 3 | polyamine biosynthesis | 7 |
| aspartate biosynthesis | 1 | Corynomycolate biosynthesis | 2 |
| lysine biosynthesis | 11 | ||
| arginine biosynthesis | 9 | ATP maintenance | 1 |
| asparagine biosynthesis | 2 | coenzyme A biosynthesis | 5 |
| threonine biosynthesis | 2 | folate transformations | 2 |
| isoleucine biosynthesis | 5 | formylTHF biosynthesis | 9 |
| leucine biosynthesis | 4 | NAD biosynthesis | 19 |
| proline biosynthesis | 5 | O-antigen biosynthesis | 1 |
| serine biosynthesis | 3 | pantothenate biosynthesis | 6 |
| tyrosine biosynthesis | 3 | riboflavin and FMN and FAD biosynthesis | 9 |
| tryptophan biosynthesis | 6 | tetrahydrofolate biosynthesis | 15 |
| cysteine biosynthesis | 2 | ||
| phenylalanine biosynthesis | 3 | homoserine biosynthesis | 1 |
| glycine biosynthesis | 1 | chorismate biosynthesis | 7 |
| methionine biosynthesis | 17 | spermine biosynthesis | 1 |
| histidine biosynthesis | 10 | ||
| interconversion of arginine, ornithine and proline | 10 | trehalose biosynthesis | 2 |
| starch biosynthesis | 12 | ||
The reaction "Biomass synthesis" indicates the hypothetical reaction to synthesize biomass, which represents the requirement of precursors and coenzymes for the biomass formation.
Figure 2Metabolic flux profiles of . (a) The metabolic fluxes obtained by performing 13C-tracer experiment [10] and (b) the simulated metabolic fluxes with the same GUR and OUR are presented. The black and gray arrows represent reactions with non-zero and zero fluxes, respectively. Abbreviations are as follows: E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; 6PG, 6-phospho-d-gluconate; Xu5P, xylulose-5-phosphate; Pyr, pyruvate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; LYS, lysine; Suc, succinate; Cit, citrate; IsoCit, Isocitrate; aKG, a-ketoglutarate; MAL, malate; FUM, fumarate; OAA, oxaloacetate.
Figure 3Result of FBA simulation: changes in the yields of organic acids, biomass, and carbon dioxide by changing the OUR/GUR ratio.
Figure 4Metabolic flux profiles of . (a) The metabolic profile obtained by performing the 3C-tracer experiment [38] and (b) the simulated metabolic profile obtained by using the same growth rate and by maximizing the lysine production rate are presented.
Candidate reactions whose disruption increases the lactate or succinate production flux predicted by FBA simulations.
| Reaction disabled by gene deletion | Lactate production flux (mmol/gDW/h) | Growth rate (1/h) |
| (Wild type) | 3.33 (1.00) | 9.54 × 10-2 (1.00) |
| ADP + Pi + 4H [e] → ATP + H2O + H | 5.13 (1.54) | 8.50 × 10-2 (0.89) |
| R5P + Xu5P ↔ S7P + GAP | 5.02 (1.51) | 9.06 × 10-2 (0.95) |
| MAL ↔ FUM + H2O | 4.99 (1.50) | 8.97 × 10-2 (0.94) |
| G6P + NADP → 6PGL + NADPH + H | 4.99 (1.50) | 9.06 × 10-2 (0.95) |
| Reaction disabled by gene deletion | Succinate production flux (mmol/gDW/h) | Growth rate (1/h) |
| (Wild type) | 1.05 (1.00) | 9.54 × 10-2 (1.00) |
| NADH + PYR + H ↔ LAC + NAD | 2.24 (2.13) | 8.11 × 10-2 (0.85) |
Lactate and succinate production fluxes and growth rate of strains in which a reaction is disabled by gene deletion are presented. The production fluxes and growth rate were calculated with the parameters GUR = 0.3 mmol/gDW/h and OUR = 0.03 mmol/gDW/h. Values in parenthesis represent fold change compared with those of wild type. Abbreviations are as follows: H [e], extracellular proton; MAL, malate; FUM, fumarate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; 6-PGL, 6-phospho-D-glucono-1,5-lactone; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; Xu5P, xylulose-5-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PYR, pyruvate; LAC, l-lactate.