BACKGROUND: Ethanol induces similar behavioral responses in mammals and the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. By coupling assays for ethanol-related behavior to the genetic tools available in flies, a number of genes have been identified that influence physiological responses to ethanol. To enhance the utility of the Drosophila model for investigating genes involved in ethanol-related behavior, we explored the value of an assay that measures the sedative effects of ethanol on negative geotaxis, an evoked locomotor response. METHODS: We established eRING (ethanol Rapid Iterative Negative Geotaxis) as an assay for quantitating the sedative effects of ethanol on negative geotaxis (i.e., startle-induced climbing). We validated the assay by assessing acute sensitivity to ethanol and rapid ethanol tolerance in several different control strains and in flies with mutations known to disrupt these behaviors. We also used eRING in a candidate screen to identify mutants with altered ethanol-related behaviors. RESULTS: Negative geotaxis measured in eRING assays was dose-dependently impaired by ethanol exposure. Flies developed tolerance to the intoxicating effects of ethanol when tested during a second exposure. Ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance varied across 4 control strains, but internal ethanol concentrations were indistinguishable in the 4 strains during a first and second challenge with ethanol. Ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance, respectively, were altered in flies with mutations in amnesiac and hangover, genes known to influence these traits. Additionally, mutations in the beta integrin gene myospheroid and the alpha integrin gene scab increased the initial sensitivity to ethanol and enhanced the development of rapid ethanol tolerance without altering internal ethanol concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The eRING assay is suitable for investigating genetic mechanisms that influence ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance. Ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance depend on the function of alpha and beta integrins in flies.
BACKGROUND:Ethanol induces similar behavioral responses in mammals and the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. By coupling assays for ethanol-related behavior to the genetic tools available in flies, a number of genes have been identified that influence physiological responses to ethanol. To enhance the utility of the Drosophila model for investigating genes involved in ethanol-related behavior, we explored the value of an assay that measures the sedative effects of ethanol on negative geotaxis, an evoked locomotor response. METHODS: We established eRING (ethanol Rapid Iterative Negative Geotaxis) as an assay for quantitating the sedative effects of ethanol on negative geotaxis (i.e., startle-induced climbing). We validated the assay by assessing acute sensitivity to ethanol and rapid ethanol tolerance in several different control strains and in flies with mutations known to disrupt these behaviors. We also used eRING in a candidate screen to identify mutants with altered ethanol-related behaviors. RESULTS: Negative geotaxis measured in eRING assays was dose-dependently impaired by ethanol exposure. Flies developed tolerance to the intoxicating effects of ethanol when tested during a second exposure. Ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance varied across 4 control strains, but internal ethanol concentrations were indistinguishable in the 4 strains during a first and second challenge with ethanol. Ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance, respectively, were altered in flies with mutations in amnesiac and hangover, genes known to influence these traits. Additionally, mutations in the beta integrin gene myospheroid and the alpha integrin gene scab increased the initial sensitivity to ethanol and enhanced the development of rapid ethanol tolerance without altering internal ethanol concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The eRING assay is suitable for investigating genetic mechanisms that influence ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance. Ethanol sensitivity and rapid ethanol tolerance depend on the function of alpha and beta integrins in flies.
Authors: H J Little; M J O'Callaghan; A R Butterworth; J Wilson; J Cole; W P Watson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Tanja A Godenschwege; Dietmar Reisch; Sören Diegelmann; Kai Eberle; Natalja Funk; Martin Heisenberg; Viviane Hoppe; Jürgen Hoppe; Bert R E Klagges; Jean-René Martin; Ekaterina A Nikitina; Gabi Putz; Rita Reifegerste; Natascha Reisch; Jens Rister; Michael Schaupp; Henrike Scholz; Martin Schwärzel; Ursula Werner; Troy D Zars; Sigrid Buchner; Erich Buchner Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Andrew G Davies; Jonathan T Pierce-Shimomura; Hongkyun Kim; Miri K VanHoven; Tod R Thiele; Antonello Bonci; Cornelia I Bargmann; Steven L McIntire Journal: Cell Date: 2003-12-12 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: M M Goddeeris; E Cook-Wiens; W J Horton; H Wolf; J R Stoltzfus; M Borrusch; M S Grotewiel Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Shamsideen A Ojelade; Tianye Jia; Aylin R Rodan; Tao Chenyang; Julie L Kadrmas; Anna Cattrell; Barbara Ruggeri; Pimphen Charoen; Hervé Lemaitre; Tobias Banaschewski; Christian Büchel; Arun L W Bokde; Fabiana Carvalho; Patricia J Conrod; Herta Flor; Vincent Frouin; Jürgen Gallinat; Hugh Garavan; Penny A Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Mark Lathrop; Steven Lubbe; Jean-Luc Martinot; Tomás Paus; Michael N Smolka; Rainer Spanagel; Paul F O'Reilly; Jaana Laitinen; Juha M Veijola; Jianfeng Feng; Sylvane Desrivières; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Gunter Schumann; Adrian Rothenfluh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew D van der Vaart; Jennifer T Wolstenholme; Maren L Smith; Guy M Harris; Marcelo F Lopez; Aaron R Wolen; Howard C Becker; Robert W Williams; Michael F Miles Journal: Alcohol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: P Bhandari; J S Hill; S P Farris; B Costin; I Martin; C-L Chan; J T Alaimo; J C Bettinger; A G Davies; M F Miles; M Grotewiel Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 3.449