Literature DB >> 19644686

On the analysis of sedimentation velocity in the study of protein complexes.

Patrick H Brown1, Andrea Balbo, Peter Schuck.   

Abstract

Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation has experienced a significant transformation, precipitated by the possibility of efficiently fitting Lamm equation solutions to the experimental data. The precision of this approach depends on the ability to account for the imperfections of the experiment, both regarding the sample and the instrument. In the present work, we explore in more detail the relationship between the sedimentation process, its detection, and the model used in the mathematical data analysis. We focus on configurations that produce steep and fast-moving sedimentation boundaries, such as frequently encountered when studying large multi-protein complexes. First, as a computational tool facilitating the analysis of heterogeneous samples, we introduce the strategy of partial boundary modeling. It can simplify the modeling by restricting the direct boundary analysis to species with sedimentation coefficients in a predefined range. Next, we examine factors related to the experimental detection, including the magnitude of optical aberrations generated by out-of-focus solution columns at high protein concentrations, the relationship between the experimentally recorded signature of the meniscus and the meniscus parameter in the data analysis, and the consequences of the limited radial and temporal resolution of the absorbance optical scanning system. Surprisingly, we find that large errors can be caused by the finite scanning speed of the commercial absorbance optics, exceeding the statistical errors in the measured sedimentation coefficients by more than an order of magnitude. We describe how these effects can be computationally accounted for in SEDFIT and SEDPHAT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19644686      PMCID: PMC2755746          DOI: 10.1007/s00249-009-0514-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  43 in total

1.  Direct sedimentation analysis of interference optical data in analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  P Schuck; B Demeler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A model for sedimentation in inhomogeneous media. II. Compressibility of aqueous and organic solvents.

Authors:  Peter Schuck
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Modeling analytical ultracentrifugation experiments with an adaptive space-time finite element solution of the Lamm equation.

Authors:  Weiming Cao; Borries Demeler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Role of analytical ultracentrifugation in assessing the aggregation of protein biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Steven A Berkowitz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Quantitation of aggregates in therapeutic proteins using sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation: practical considerations that affect precision and accuracy.

Authors:  Allen Pekar; Muppalla Sukumar
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  A new adaptive grid-size algorithm for the simulation of sedimentation velocity profiles in analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Patrick H Brown; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Comput Phys Commun       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.390

7.  Characterizing protein-protein interactions by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Patrick H Brown; Andrea Balbo; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Curr Protoc Immunol       Date:  2008-05

8.  Common excipients impair detection of protein aggregates during sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  John P Gabrielson; Kelly K Arthur; Brent S Kendrick; Theodore W Randolph; Michael R Stoner
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  Tandem mass spectrometry defines the stoichiometry and quaternary structural arrangement of tryptophan molecules in the multiprotein complex TRAP.

Authors:  Margaret G McCammon; Helena Hernández; Frank Sobott; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Interaction of the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP) with anti-TRAP.

Authors:  Doug Snyder; Jeffrey Lary; Yanling Chen; Paul Gollnick; James L Cole
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  33 in total

1.  The association−dissociation behavior of the ApoE proteins: kinetic and equilibrium studies.

Authors:  Kanchan Garai; Carl Frieden
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Sedimentation patterns of rapidly reversible protein interactions.

Authors:  Peter Schuck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Variable Field Analytical Ultracentrifugation: II. Gravitational Sweep Sedimentation Velocity.

Authors:  Jia Ma; Huaying Zhao; Julia Sandmaier; J Alexander Liddle; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Using Lamm-Equation modeling of sedimentation velocity data to determine the kinetic and thermodynamic properties of macromolecular interactions.

Authors:  Chad A Brautigam
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  MDA5 cooperatively forms dimers and ATP-sensitive filaments upon binding double-stranded RNA.

Authors:  Ian C Berke; Yorgo Modis
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Mutations that probe the cooperative assembly of O⁶-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase complexes.

Authors:  Claire A Adams; Michael G Fried
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Bovine β-lactoglobulin is dimeric under imitative physiological conditions: dissociation equilibrium and rate constants over the pH range of 2.5-7.5.

Authors:  Davide Mercadante; Laurence D Melton; Gillian E Norris; Trevor S Loo; Martin A K Williams; Renwick C J Dobson; Geoffrey B Jameson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Recorded scan times can limit the accuracy of sedimentation coefficients in analytical ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Huaying Zhao; Rodolfo Ghirlando; Grzegorz Piszczek; Ute Curth; Chad A Brautigam; Peter Schuck
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  Sedimentation coefficient distributions of large particles.

Authors:  Peter Schuck
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.616

10.  Improving the thermal, radial, and temporal accuracy of the analytical ultracentrifuge through external references.

Authors:  Rodolfo Ghirlando; Andrea Balbo; Grzegorz Piszczek; Patrick H Brown; Marc S Lewis; Chad A Brautigam; Peter Schuck; Huaying Zhao
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.