Literature DB >> 19643909

Genetic differences in fruit-set patterns are determined by differences in fruit sink strength and a source : sink threshold for fruit set.

A M Wubs1, Y Ma, E Heuvelink, L F M Marcelis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fruit set in indeterminate plant species largely depends on the balance between source and sink strength. Plants of these species show fluctuations in fruit set during the growing season. It was tested whether differences in fruit sink strength among the cultivars explained the differences in fruit-set patterns.
METHODS: Capsicum was chosen as a model plant. Six cultivars with differences in fruit set, fruit size and plant growth were evaluated in a greenhouse experiment. Fruit-set patterns, generative and vegetative sink strength, source strength and the source : sink ratio at fruit set were determined. Sink strength was quantified as potential growth rate. Fruit set was related to total fruit sink strength and the source : sink ratio. The effect of differences observed in above-mentioned parameters on fruit-set patterns was examined using a simple simulation model. KEY
RESULTS: Sink strengths of individual fruits differed greatly among cultivars. Week-to-week fruit set in large-fruited cultivars fluctuated due to large fluctuations in total fruit sink strength, but in small-fruited cultivars, total fruit sink strength and fruit set were relatively constant. Large variations in week-to-week fruit set were correlated with a low fruit-set percentage. The source : sink threshold for fruit set was higher in large-fruited cultivars. Simulations showed that within the range of parameter values found in the experiment, fruit sink strength and source : sink threshold for fruit set had the largest impact on fruit set: an increase in these parameters decreased the average percentage fruit set and increased variation in weekly fruit set. Both were needed to explain the fruit-set patterns observed. The differences observed in the other parameters (e.g. source strength) had a lower effect on fruit set.
CONCLUSIONS: Both individual fruit sink strength and the source : sink threshold for fruit set were needed to explain the differences observed between fruit-set patterns of the six cultivars.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19643909      PMCID: PMC2749527          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  5 in total

1.  Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength.

Authors:  L F M Marcelis; E Heuvelink; L R Baan Hofman-Eijer; J Den Bakker; L B Xue
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Rhythms and alternating patterns in plants as emergent properties of a model of interaction between development and functioning.

Authors:  Amélie Mathieu; Paul-Henry Cournède; Daniel Barthélémy; Philippe de Reffye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  A simulation model for dry matter partitioning in cucumber.

Authors:  L F Marcelis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant.

Authors:  L F Marcelis
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Competition for assimilates and fruit position affect fruit set in indeterminate greenhouse tomato.

Authors:  N Bertin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.357

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Simulation of fruit-set and trophic competition and optimization of yield advantages in six Capsicum cultivars using functional-structural plant modelling.

Authors:  Y T Ma; A M Wubs; A Mathieu; E Heuvelink; J Y Zhu; B G Hu; P H Cournède; P de Reffye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Correlation between dynamic tomato fruit-set and source-sink ratio: a common relationship for different plant densities and seasons?

Authors:  MengZhen Kang; LiLi Yang; BaoGui Zhang; Philippe de Reffye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Exploring natural variation of photosynthetic, primary metabolism and growth parameters in a large panel of Capsicum chinense accessions.

Authors:  Laise Rosado-Souza; Federico Scossa; Izabel S Chaves; Sabrina Kleessen; Luiz F D Salvador; Jocimar C Milagre; Fernando Finger; Leonardo L Bhering; Ronan Sulpice; Wagner L Araújo; Zoran Nikoloski; Alisdair R Fernie; Adriano Nunes-Nesi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Expression of CsSEF1 gene encoding putative CCCH zinc finger protein is induced by defoliation and prolonged darkness in cucumber fruit.

Authors:  Akio Tazuke; Munehiko Asayama
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Dry matter partitioning models for the simulation of individual fruit growth in greenhouse cucumber canopies.

Authors:  Dirk Wiechers; Katrin Kahlen; Hartmut Stützel
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Post-pruning shoot growth increases fruit abscission and reduces stem carbohydrates and yield in macadamia.

Authors:  Lisa M McFadyen; David Robertson; Margaret Sedgley; Paul Kristiansen; Trevor Olesen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Quantifying the source-sink balance and carbohydrate content in three tomato cultivars.

Authors:  Tao Li; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Resistance and Not Plant Fruit Traits Determine Root-Associated Bacterial Community Composition along a Domestication Gradient in Tomato.

Authors:  Lisanne Smulders; Victoria Ferrero; Eduardo de la Peña; María J Pozo; Juan Antonio Díaz Pendón; Emilio Benítez; Álvaro López-García
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23

9.  Integrated dominance mechanisms regulate reproductive architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus.

Authors:  Catriona H Walker; Cara D Wheeldon; Tom Bennett
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 8.340

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.