Literature DB >> 19643701

Sensitivity and spatial resolution of transvenous leads in implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Jesús Requena-Carrión1, Juho Väisänen, Felipe Alonso-Atienza, Arcadi García-Alberola, Francisco Javier Ramos-López, José Luis Rojo-Alvarez.   

Abstract

It has been previously documented that the main features and sensing performance of electrograms (EGMs) recorded in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) depend on lead configuration. Although this dependence has been ascribed to differences in lead sensitivity and spatial resolution, the quantification of these two properties on ICD has not yet been attempted. In this paper, an operative framework to study the spatial resolution of ICD transvenous leads is presented. We propose to quantify the spatial resolution of ICD transvenous leads based on a new characterization called lead resolution volume (ResV). We analyzed the sensitivity distribution and the ResV of two unipolar (tip-can and coil-can ) and two bipolar (true or tip-ring and integrated or tip-coil) ICD transvenous lead configurations. A detailed 3-D model of the human thorax based on the visible human man dataset was used to compute the lead sensitivity and computer simulations of simple cardiac dynamics were used to quantify the ResV. Differences in the sensitivity distribution throughout the ventricular myocardium (VM) were observed for each lead configuration. In our computer model of the human thorax, the ResV was found to comprise 7%, 35%, 45%, and 70% of the VM for true bipolar, integrated bipolar, tip-can unipolar, and coil-can unipolar ICD leads, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis shows that the spatial resolution depends on both lead sensitivity and cardiac dynamics, and therefore, it can vary for different heart rhythms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19643701     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2027425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  4 in total

1.  Modelling the heart as a communication system.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ashikaga; José Aguilar-Rodríguez; Shai Gorsky; Elizabeth Lusczek; Flávia Maria Darcie Marquitti; Brian Thompson; Degang Wu; Joshua Garland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Construction of intracardiac vectorcardiogram from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intracardiac electrograms.

Authors:  Elyar Ghafoori; Muammar M Kabir; Jian Cao; Alexei Shvilkin; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  Intracardiac J-point elevation before the onset of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Aaron McCabe; Lichy Han; Sanjoli Sur; Timothy Huang; Joseph E Marine; Alan Cheng; David D Spragg; Sunil Sinha; Hugh Calkins; Kenneth Stein; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.