Literature DB >> 19641238

Neutron equivalent doses and associated lifetime cancer incidence risks for head & neck and spinal proton therapy.

Basit S Athar1, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

In this work we have simulated the absorbed equivalent doses to various organs distant to the field edge assuming proton therapy treatments of brain or spine lesions. We have used computational whole-body (gender-specific and age-dependent) voxel phantoms and considered six treatment fields with varying treatment volumes and depths. The maximum neutron equivalent dose to organs near the field edge was found to be approximately 8 mSv Gy(-1). We were able to clearly demonstrate that organ-specific neutron equivalent doses are age (stature) dependent. For example, assuming an 8-year-old patient, the dose to brain from the spinal fields ranged from 0.04 to 0.10 mSv Gy(-1), whereas the dose to the brain assuming a 9-month-old patient ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 mSv Gy(-1). Further, as the field aperture opening increases, the secondary neutron equivalent dose caused by the treatment head decreases, while the secondary neutron equivalent dose caused by the patient itself increases. To interpret the dosimetric data, we analyzed second cancer incidence risks for various organs as a function of patient age and field size based on two risk models. The results show that, for example, in an 8-year-old female patient treated with a spinal proton therapy field, breasts, lungs and rectum have the highest radiation-induced lifetime cancer incidence risks. These are estimated to be 0.71%, 1.05% and 0.60%, respectively. For an 11-year-old male patient treated with a spinal field, bronchi and rectum show the highest risks of 0.32% and 0.43%, respectively. Risks for male and female patients increase as their age at treatment time decreases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641238     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/16/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  Predicted risks of second malignant neoplasm incidence and mortality due to secondary neutrons in a girl and boy receiving proton craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Anita Mahajan; Dragan Mirkovic; Rui Zhang; Annelise Giebeler; David Kornguth; Mark Harvey; Shiao Woo; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  An analytic model of neutron ambient dose equivalent and equivalent dose for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Jonas D Fontenot; Phillip J Taddei; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  PET/CT-guided treatment planning for paediatric cancer patients: a simulation study of proton and conventional photon therapy.

Authors:  J S Kornerup; N P Brodin; T Björk-Eriksson; C Birk Christensen; A Kiil-Berthelsen; M C Aznar; C Hollensen; E Markova; P Munck Af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A comparative study on the risk of second primary cancers in out-of-field organs associated with radiotherapy of localized prostate carcinoma using Monte Carlo-based accelerator and patient models.

Authors:  Bryan Bednarz; Basit Athar; X George Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of out-of-field photon doses in 6 MV IMRT and neutron doses in proton therapy for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Basit S Athar; Bryan Bednarz; Joao Seco; Cindy Hancox; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  ADVANTAGES OF MCNPX-BASED LATTICE TALLY OVER MESH TALLY IN HIGH-SPEED MONTE CARLO DOSE RECONSTRUCTION FOR PROTON RADIOTHERAPY.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jonas D Fontenot; Dragan Mirkovic; John S Hendricks; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2013-07

7.  Comparison of second cancer risk due to out-of-field doses from 6-MV IMRT and proton therapy based on 6 pediatric patient treatment plans.

Authors:  Basit S Athar; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 9.  Hybrid computational phantoms for medical dose reconstruction.

Authors:  Wesley Bolch; Choonsik Lee; Michael Wayson; Perry Johnson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  Dosimetric Comparison and Potential for Improved Clinical Outcomes of Paediatric CNS Patients Treated with Protons or IMRT.

Authors:  Kris S Armoogum; Nicola Thorp
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.