Literature DB >> 19640040

Limit cycle oscillations in a nonlinear state space model of the human cochlea.

Emery M Ku1, Stephen J Elliott, Ben Lineton.   

Abstract

It is somewhat surprising that linear analysis can account for so many features of the cochlea when it is inherently nonlinear. For example, the commonly detected spacing between adjacent spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) is often explained by a linear theory of "coherent reflection" [Zweig and Shera (1995). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2018-2047]. The nonlinear saturation of the cochlear amplifier is, however, believed to be responsible for stabilizing the amplitude of a SOAE. In this investigation, a state space model is used to first predict the linear instabilities that arise, given distributions of cochlear inhomogeneities, and then subsequently to simulate the time-varying spectra of the nonlinear models. By comparing nonlinear simulation results to linear predictions, it is demonstrated that nonlinear effects can have a strong impact on the steady-state response of an unstable cochlear model. Sharply tuned components that decay away exponentially within 100 ms are shown to be due to linearly resonant modes of the model generated by the cochlear inhomogeneities. Some oscillations at linearly unstable frequencies are suppressed over a longer time scale, whereas those that persist are due to linear instabilities and their distortion products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640040     DOI: 10.1121/1.3158861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Florian Fruth; Frank Jülicher; Benjamin Lindner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-08

4.  Distortion product emissions from a cochlear model with nonlinear mechanoelectrical transduction in outer hair cells.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Salient features of otoacoustic emissions are common across tetrapod groups and suggest shared properties of generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Geoffrey A Manley; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Whistling While it Works: Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions and the Cochlear Amplifier.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

8.  Reducing tectorial membrane viscoelasticity enhances spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and compromises the detection of low level sound.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Charlsie Lemons; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  High-multiple spontaneous otoacoustic emissions confirm theory of local tuned oscillators.

Authors:  Martin Braun
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.