Literature DB >> 19639959

Evaluation of several MS/MS search algorithms for analysis of spectra derived from electron transfer dissociation experiments.

Kumaran Kandasamy1, Akhilesh Pandey, Henrik Molina.   

Abstract

Electron transfer dissociation (ETD) is increasingly becoming popular for high-throughput experiments especially in the identification of the labile post-translational modifications. Most search algorithms that are currently in use for querying MS/MS data against protein databases have been optimized on the basis of matching fragment ions derived from collision induced dissociation of peptides, which are dominated by b and y ions. However, electron transfer dissociation of peptides generates completely different types of fragments: c and z ions. The goal of our study was to test the ability of different search algorithms to handle data from this fragmentation method. We compared four MS/MS search algorithms (OMSSA, Mascot, Spectrum Mill, and X!Tandem) using approximately 170,000 spectra generated from a standard protein mix, as well as from complex proteomic samples which included a large number of phosphopeptides. Our analysis revealed (1) greater differences between algorithms than has been previously reported for CID data, (2) a significant charge state bias resulting in >60-fold difference in the numbers of matched doubly charged peptides, and (3) identification of 70% more peptides by the best performing algorithm than the algorithm identifying the least number of peptides. Our results indicate that the search engines for analyzing ETD derived MS/MS spectra are still in their early days and that multiple search engines could be used to reduce individual biases of algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19639959     DOI: 10.1021/ac9006107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  28 in total

1.  Improving software performance for peptide electron transfer dissociation data analysis by implementation of charge state- and sequence-dependent scoring.

Authors:  Peter R Baker; Katalin F Medzihradszky; Robert J Chalkley
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Nuno Bandeira; Uri Keich; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Proteome informatics research group (iPRG)_2012: a study on detecting modified peptides in a complex mixture.

Authors:  Robert J Chalkley; Nuno Bandeira; Matthew C Chambers; Karl R Clauser; John S Cottrell; Eric W Deutsch; Eugene A Kapp; Henry H N Lam; W Hayes McDonald; Thomas A Neubert; Rui-Xiang Sun
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Effects of electron-transfer coupled with collision-induced dissociation (ET/CID) on doubly charged peptides and phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Liu; Chien-Chen Lai
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  A face in the crowd: recognizing peptides through database search.

Authors:  Jimmy K Eng; Brian C Searle; Karl R Clauser; David L Tabb
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Ablation of Dicer leads to widespread perturbation of signaling pathways.

Authors:  Nandini A Sahasrabuddhe; Tai-Chung Huang; Praveen Kumar; Yi Yang; Bidyut Ghosh; Steven D Leach; Raghothama Chaerkady; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  ETD fragmentation features improve algorithm.

Authors:  Wenzhou Li; Vicki H Wysocki
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.940

8.  Assessment of resolution parameters for CID-based shotgun proteomic experiments on the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Min-Sik Kim; Kumaran Kandasamy; Raghothama Chaerkady; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Identification of prosaposin and transgelin as potential biomarkers for gallbladder cancer using quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Nandini A Sahasrabuddhe; Mustafa A Barbhuiya; Shushruta Bhunia; Tejaswini Subbannayya; Harsha Gowda; Jayshree Advani; Braj R Shrivastav; Sanjay Navani; Pamela Leal; Juan Carlos Roa; Raghothama Chaerkady; Sanjeev Gupta; Aditi Chatterjee; Akhilesh Pandey; Pramod K Tiwari
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Database search strategies for proteomic data sets generated by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Steve M M Sweet; Andrew W Jones; Debbie L Cunningham; John K Heath; Andrew J Creese; Helen J Cooper
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.