Literature DB >> 19637950

Frequency and severity of harm of medication errors related to the parenteral nutrition process in a large university teaching hospital.

Gordon S Sacks1, Steve Rough, Kenneth A Kudsk.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of medication errors, as well as the severity of harm resulting from these errors, related to the prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration of parenteral nutrition formulations.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: 471-bed, academic teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All adult and pediatric inpatients receiving parenteral nutrition between November 1, 2002 and May 31, 2004.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The occurrence of incorrect prescribing practices, wrong formulation preparation, operational system errors, order entry errors related to automated technology, and incorrect administration practices were documented. In addition, the specific step in the drug process--prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration--at the time that the error occurred was noted. Harm scores, to assess the severity of the error in relation to the safety of the patient, were assigned based on the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP). The rate of errors with parenteral nutrition was then compared with the rate of errors with other high-alert drugs, both at our institution and at a health care consortium. A total of 4730 prescriptions for parenteral nutrition were written during the study period; 74 (1.6%) were associated with a medication error. Of these errors, 1 (1%) occurred during the prescription process (and was detected before preparation), 29 (39%) occurred during the transcription process, 18 (24%) during preparation, and 26 (35%) during the administration process. Sixty-seven (91%) of the 74 errors were considered nonharmful, as defined by NCC MERP, whereas 6 (8%) contributed to or resulted in temporary harm to a patient. The rate of errors was similar between our institution and the consortium, both for parenteral nutrition formulations and for other high-alert drugs. The overall incidence of medication errors during the study was 15.6 errors/1000 parenteral nutrition prescriptions compounded.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that medication errors related to the prescription, transcription, preparation, and administration of parenteral nutrition formulations occur and occasionally result in harm. Health care institutions should develop quality assurance programs to document compliance with published safe practice guidelines for parenteral nutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19637950     DOI: 10.1592/phco.29.8.966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  13 in total

Review 1.  Parenteral nutrition: a call to action for harmonization of policies to increase patient safety.

Authors:  Valery Gallagher; David Berlana; Mattias Paulsson; Rebecca Jayne White
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Using a Trigger Tool to Assess Adverse Drug Events in a Children's Rehabilitation Hospital.

Authors:  Kelly J Burch
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-07

3.  Use of Piggyback Electrolytes for Patients Receiving Individually Prescribed vs Premixed Parenteral Nutrition.

Authors:  Rebecca A Busch; Caitlin S Curtis; Glen E Leverson; Kenneth A Kudsk
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Parenteral Protein Decision Support System Improves Protein Delivery in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mhd Wael Alrifai; David P Mulherin; Stuart T Weinberg; Li Wang; Christoph U Lehmann
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Patient Safety Incidents Related to the Use of Parenteral Nutrition in All Patient Groups: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Priya Mistry; Rebecca Heather Smith; Andy Fox
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Detection of medication administration errors at a tertiary hospital using a direct observation approach.

Authors:  Alaa M Yousef; Rana K Abu-Farha; Khawla M Abu-Hammour
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-24

7.  Home Parenteral Nutrition and Intravenous Fluid Errors Discovered Through Novel Clinical Practice of Reconciling Compounding Records: A Case Series.

Authors:  Margaret K Murphy; Kathleen M Gura; Christina Tascione; Alexandra N Carey; Christopher P Duggan; Bram P Raphael
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 8.  Systematic evidence review of rates and burden of harm of intravenous admixture drug preparation errors in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Nancy Hedlund; Idal Beer; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Evaluation of parenteral nutritional support in the surgical and medical wards of a referral teaching hospital.

Authors:  Samaneh Bairami; Sepideh Elyasi; Hossein Khalili; Saeed Reza Jamali-Moghadam
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Standardised parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Karen Simmer; Abhijeet Rakshasbhuvankar; Girish Deshpande
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.