Literature DB >> 19637945

Lack of effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on pharmacokinetics of hormonal contraceptives.

Brian P Kearney1, Anita Mathias.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential for a drug-drug interaction between a representative hormonal contraceptive (norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF), a prodrug of tenofovir, when coadministered.
DESIGN: Thirty-day, open-label, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study.
SETTING: Single clinical phase I center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty nonpregnant and nonlactating women aged 19-45 years who were taking a norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive. INTERVENTION: Each woman received norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol alone on study days 1-22, followed by norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol plus tenofovir DF 300 mg once/day for 7 days during two consecutive 28-day contraceptive cycles.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed over 24 hours on study days 1 and 29 (corresponding to matching days [day 21] of the two contraceptive cycles). Serum or plasma concentrations of tenofovir, norgestimate and its active metabolite deacetyl norgestimate, and ethinyl estradiol were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for the pharmacokinetic parameters for deacetyl norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol were estimated by using analysis of variance and compared with the no-effect criterion for bioequivalence. The tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with historical controls. Pharmacokinetic parameters for deacetyl norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol were unaltered by coadministration of tenofovir DF. The tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters in subjects receiving norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol were consistent with historical control data for tenofovir.
CONCLUSION: Tenofovir DF and norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol are not involved in a clinically significant drug-drug interaction; tenofovir DF did not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of norgestimate or ethinyl estradiol, including the concentration at the end of the dosing interval. Both drugs were well tolerated when coadministered. Tenofovir DF is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of hormonal oral contraceptives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19637945     DOI: 10.1592/phco.29.8.924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  20 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions between antiretrovirals and oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Victoria Tittle; Lauren Bull; Marta Boffito; Nneka Nwokolo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  The Importance of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Research for Transgender and Gender-Nonbinary Individuals.

Authors:  Sara Gianella; J Sonya Haw; Jill Blumenthal; Brooke Sullivan; Davey Smith
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention does not diminish the pregnancy prevention effectiveness of hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Pamela M Murnane; Renee Heffron; Allan Ronald; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Deborah Donnell; Nelly R Mugo; Edwin Were; Andrew Mujugira; James Kiarie; Connie Celum; Jared M Baeten
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  No Dose Adjustment is Recommended for Digoxin, Warfarin, Atorvastatin or a Combination Oral Contraceptive When Coadministered with Dulaglutide.

Authors:  Amparo de la Peña; Xuewei Cui; Jeanne Geiser; Corina Loghin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Immunologic, virologic, and pharmacologic characterization of the female upper genital tract in HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Lisa Rahangdale; Kristina De Paris; Angela D M Kashuba; Julie A E Nelson; Mackenzie Cottrell; Craig Sykes; Cindi Emerson; Steven L Young; Trenton Stevens; Kristine B Patterson; Myron S Cohen
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 6.  Effects of hormonal contraception on antiretroviral drug metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; Sharon Anderson; Gustavo F Doncel
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 7.  Drug-Drug Interactions, Effectiveness, and Safety of Hormonal Contraceptives in Women Living with HIV.

Authors:  Kimberly K Scarsi; Kristin M Darin; Catherine A Chappell; Stephanie M Nitz; Mohammed Lamorde
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Current and future contraceptive options for women living with HIV.

Authors:  Rena C Patel; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Jared M Baeten
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.889

9.  Contraception in HIV-positive female adolescents.

Authors:  Nadia T Kancheva Landolt; Sudrak Lakhonphon; Jintanat Ananworanich
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate levels among Kenyan women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in the FEM-PrEP trial.

Authors:  Kavita Nanda; Rebecca Callahan; Douglas Taylor; Meng Wang; Kawango Agot; David Jenkins; Lut Van Damme; Laneta Dorflinger
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.