Literature DB >> 19637245

Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer.

Roderick C N van den Bergh1, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Monique J Roobol, Tineke Wolters, Fritz H Schröder, Chris H Bangma, Ewout W Steyerberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients on active surveillance (AS) for early prostate cancer (PC) may experience feelings of anxiety and distress while living with "untreated" cancer. In this study, these feelings were quantified, and their associations with various psychologic, medical, demographic, and decision-related factors were assessed.
METHODS: Men with recently diagnosed PC who participated in a prospective protocol-based AS program (the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance study [PRAIS]) received a questionnaire (N = 150). Scores concerning decisional conflict (the Decisional Conflict Scale), depression (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), generic anxiety (the abridged State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and PC-specific anxiety (the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer) were compared with reference values and the literature. Associations with scores on physical health (the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item short-form Physical Component Summary), personality (the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire), shared decision-making, knowledge of PC, and demographic and medical parameters were determined with univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate was 86% (129 of 150 men). Of all respondents, 81%, 92%, 83%, and 93% scored better than reference values for clinically significant uncertainty regarding the treatment decision, depression, generic anxiety, and PC-specific anxiety, respectively. Scores were comparable to or more favorable than those of men (reported in literature) who underwent other treatments for localized PC. In multivariate analysis, the following associations emerged: a perceived important role of the physician in shared decision-making was associated with higher decisional conflict, better physical health was associated with lower depression, neurotic personality was associated with higher depression and with generic and PC-specific anxiety, and higher prostate-specific antigen level was associated with higher PC-specific anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: Men on protocol-based AS mainly reported favorable levels of anxiety and distress. A neurotic personality score was associated with unfavorable effects. These findings may help to optimize patient selection for AS or to select men for supportive measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19637245     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  57 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Clinical efficacy of primary combined androgen blockade for Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer unsuitable for local definitive treatment: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Minoru Kobayashi; Akinori Nukui; Kazumi Suzuki; Shinsuke Kurokawa; Tatsuo Morita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  A review of focal therapy techniques in prostate cancer: clinical results for high-intensity focused ultrasound and focal cryoablation.

Authors:  Colin T Iberti; Nihal Mohamed; Michael A Palese
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

4.  The Development of an eHealth tool suite for prostate cancer patients and their partners.

Authors:  Donna Van Bogaert; Robert Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; David Jarrard
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15

5.  Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; Tania Lobo; George Luta; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Amethyst D Leimpeter; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  [Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  K Lellig; B Beyer; M Graefen; D Zaak; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Factors associated with emotional distress in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Christian J Nelson; Willie Underwood; D Lynn Homish; Deepak A Kapoor
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Variation in serum prostate-specific antigen levels in men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Authors:  Behfar Ehdaie; Bing Ying Poon; Daniel D Sjoberg; Pedro Recabal; Vincent Laudone; Karim Touijer; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Timing of curative treatment for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Peter C Albertsen; Chris H Bangma; Stephen J Freedland; Markus Graefen; Andrew Vickers; Henk G van der Poel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The Influence of Psychosocial Constructs on the Adherence to Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer in a Prospective, Population-based Cohort.

Authors:  Maximilian F Lang; Mark D Tyson; JoAnn Rudd Alvarez; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Matthew J Resnick; Matthew R Cooperberg; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien Chen; Lisa E Paddock; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Antoinette Stroup; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.