Literature DB >> 19637210

An efficient algorithm for multistate protein design based on FASTER.

Benjamin D Allen1, Stephen L Mayo.   

Abstract

Most of the methods that have been developed for computational protein design involve the selection of side-chain conformations in the context of a single, fixed main-chain structure. In contrast, multistate design (MSD) methods allow sequence selection to be driven by the energetic contributions of multiple structural or chemical states simultaneously. This methodology is expected to be useful when the design target is an ensemble of related states rather than a single structure, or when a protein sequence must assume several distinct conformations to function. MSD can also be used with explicit negative design to suggest sequences with altered structural, binding, or catalytic specificity. We report implementation details of an efficient multistate design optimization algorithm based on FASTER (MSD-FASTER). We subjected the algorithm to a battery of computational tests and found it to be generally applicable to various multistate design problems; designs with a large number of states and many designed positions are completely feasible. A direct comparison of MSD-FASTER and multistate design Monte Carlo indicated that MSD-FASTER discovers low-energy sequences much more consistently. MSD-FASTER likely performs better because amino acid substitutions are chosen on an energetic basis rather than randomly, and because multiple substitutions are applied together. Through its greater efficiency, MSD-FASTER should allow protein designers to test experimentally better-scoring sequences, and thus accelerate progress in the development of improved scoring functions and models for computational protein design. 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19637210     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  20 in total

1.  Creating novel protein scripts beyond natural alphabets.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Vibin Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2011-03-01

2.  Experimental library screening demonstrates the successful application of computational protein design to large structural ensembles.

Authors:  Benjamin D Allen; Alex Nisthal; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions.

Authors:  Daniel J Mandell; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Computationally optimized deimmunization libraries yield highly mutated enzymes with low immunogenicity and enhanced activity.

Authors:  Regina S Salvat; Deeptak Verma; Andrew S Parker; Jack R Kirsch; Seth A Brooks; Chris Bailey-Kellogg; Karl E Griswold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Tailor-made transcriptional biosensors for optimizing microbial cell factories.

Authors:  Brecht De Paepe; Gert Peters; Pieter Coussement; Jo Maertens; Marjan De Mey
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Multistate approaches in computational protein design.

Authors:  James A Davey; Roberto A Chica
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Rational design of a ligand-controlled protein conformational switch.

Authors:  Onur Dagliyan; David Shirvanyants; Andrei V Karginov; Feng Ding; Lanette Fee; Srinivas N Chandrasekaran; Christina M Freisinger; Gromoslaw A Smolen; Anna Huttenlocher; Klaus M Hahn; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Rational design of proteins that exchange on functional timescales.

Authors:  James A Davey; Adam M Damry; Natalie K Goto; Roberto A Chica
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 9.  Algorithms for protein design.

Authors:  Pablo Gainza; Hunter M Nisonoff; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 10.  Specificity in computational protein design.

Authors:  James J Havranek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.