Literature DB >> 19637080

Experimental and theoretical analysis of cytokine release for the study of radiation-induced bystander effect.

Angelica Facoetti1, Luca Mariotti, Francesca Ballarini, Alessia Bertolotti, Rosanna Nano, Francesca Pasi, Elena Ranza, Andrea Ottolenghi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the experimental conditions that might influence the release of cytokines in the culture medium and give some basic input for building a model for cytokine (e.g., Interleukin-6, IL-6) regulation in the case of 'sham irradiation' and after ionising radiation exposure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The influence of cell type, cell density, medium volume, medium storage temperature and other methodological aspects on IL-6 and Interleukin-8 (IL-8) release were investigated. In addition, the effects over the time of different doses of gamma irradiation on the clonogenic survival of bystander cells and on the secretion of these cytokines were studied.
RESULTS: We observed significant decreases of clonogenic survival in AG01522 and T98G cells after the transfer of medium collected 5 and 20 h after low doses of gamma irradiation. Concerning the Interleukins' measurements, our experiments showed that the aggregate removal modalities tested, and up to 10 freeze-thaw cycles, do not have significant influence on the measurements of IL-6 concentration in the medium. We also observed that the IL-6 accumulated in the medium of human fibroblasts is not degraded when maintained at 37 degrees C. Sets of experiments demonstrated that cell density or medium volume do not influence the release of IL-6. On the contrary, our results showed that IL-8 released by glioblastoma cells strongly depends on the amount of medium. Finally, the exposure of fibroblasts to gamma irradiation has influence on the release kinetics of both IL-6 and IL-8 with peculiar features.
CONCLUSIONS: This study solved some of the methodological doubts concerning the study of bystander effects by means of the medium transfer technique; moreover it also highlighted some experimental aspects that need to be considered when approaching this sort of experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19637080     DOI: 10.1080/09553000903020016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  9 in total

1.  Regulation of early signaling and gene expression in the alpha-particle and bystander response of IMR-90 human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Shanaz A Ghandhi; Lihua Ming; Vladimir N Ivanov; Tom K Hei; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.063

2.  Analysis of chemokine and chemokine receptor expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) cell lines.

Authors:  Hendrik A Wolff; David Rolke; Margret Rave-Fränk; Markus Schirmer; Wolfgang Eicheler; Annegret Doerfler; Andrea Hille; Clemens F Hess; Christoph Matthias; Ralph M W Rödel; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Bystander signaling via oxidative metabolism.

Authors:  Humaira Aziz Sawal; Kashif Asghar; Matthias Bureik; Nasir Jalal
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide signaling in bystander cells.

Authors:  Kishore Kumar Jella; Roisin Moriarty; Brendan McClean; Hugh J Byrne; Fiona M Lyng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE MECHANISTIC MODELS OF RADIATION-INDUCED NON-TARGETED EFFECTS (NTE).

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  A simulation study of the radiation-induced bystander effect: modeling with stochastically defined signal reemission.

Authors:  Kohei Sasaki; Kosuke Wakui; Kaori Tsutsumi; Akio Itoh; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  The biological effect of large single doses: a possible role for non-targeted effects in cell inactivation.

Authors:  Marlon R Veldwijk; Bo Zhang; Frederik Wenz; Carsten Herskind
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An agent-based model of the response to angioplasty and bare-metal stent deployment in an atherosclerotic blood vessel.

Authors:  Antonia E Curtin; Leming Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  BRCA1, FANCD2 and Chk1 are potential molecular targets for the modulation of a radiation-induced DNA damage response in bystander cells.

Authors:  Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Kai Rothkamm; Keeva McClelland; Shahnaz T Al Rashid; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 8.679

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.