Literature DB >> 19636610

Use of retrieval bags in incidental gallbladder cancer cases.

Thorsten Oliver Goetze1, Vittorio Paolucci.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accidental intraoperative gallbladder perforation is a problem in laparoscopic surgery, especially in cases with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). The question is whether intraoperative gallbladder perforation has a prognostic disadvantage or a retrieval bag provides protection against tumor dissemination.
METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was sent to all German surgical clinics based on the central register of "incidental gallbladder carcinoma" of the German Society of Surgery founded in 1997.
RESULTS: In 592 IGBC-registered cases, there were 330 laparoscopies, 154 open surgeries, and intraoperative conversion was performed in 106 cases. Of laparoscopic surgeries (n = 330), the recurrence rate was 30%. The recurrence rate for cases with (174/330) and without (156/330) the use of retrieval bag was 32.2% and 27%, respectively. In laparoscopies with intraoperative gallbladder perforation (73/330 cases), the recurrence rate was 38.4%. Of these cases the recurrence rate with (51/73) and without (22/73) the use of retrieval bags was 39.2% and 36.4%, respectively. In 257 cases without intraoperative perforation, tumor recurrence rate was 27.2%, and it was 29.3% or 25.4% with (123/257) and without (134/257) the use of retrieval bags.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the registry data, the intraoperative gallbladder perforation results in significant (P = 0.047) prognostic disadvantage and in these cases retrieval bags were used more often (P = 0.001). However, in IGBC cases if intraoperative gallbladder perforation has already happened, the use of retrieval bags had no protective effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636610     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0163-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

1.  Wound recurrence from gallbladder cancer after open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O Lundberg; A Kristoffersson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  A powder-free surgical glove bag for retraction of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jørgen Bendix Holme; Frank Viborg Mortensen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Cutaneous seeding of gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F Drouard; J Delamarre; J P Capron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Benefits of reoperation of T2 and more advanced incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German registry.

Authors:  Thorsten Oliver Goetze; Vittorio Paolucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  An inexpensive laparoscopic specimen retrieval bag.

Authors:  P K Raj; F Katris; C G Linderman; S G ReMine
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and unsuspected gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  F Romano; C Franciosi; R Caprotti; S De Fina; G Porta; G Visintini; F Uggeri
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 7.  Port site recurrences after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  V Paolucci
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2001

8.  Intraabdominal contamination after gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its complications.

Authors:  T Kimura; H Goto; Y Takeuchi; M Yoshida; T Kobayashi; S Sakuramachi; Y Harada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Trocar-site metastasis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for unsuspected carcinoma of the gallbladder. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  J C Copher; J J Rogers; M L Dalton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery. A review.

Authors:  B Schaeff; V Paolucci; J Thomopoulos
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

View more
  9 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Anil K Agarwal; Amit Javed; Raja Kalayarasan; Puja Sakhuja
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Precise preoperative imaging and adequate oncologic resection is most important in achieving long-term prognosis in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ulrich K Fetzner; Klaus L Prenzel; Hakan Alakus; Arnulf H Hölscher; Dirk L Stippel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Bile spillage should be avoided in elective cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Per Sandstrom; Bergthor Bjornsson
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 4.  Technical Aspects of Gallbladder Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Motaz Qadan; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  The role of laparoscopic staging in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Jean M Butte; Mithat Gönen; Peter J Allen; Michael I D'Angelica; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; Ronald P Dematteo; Leslie Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Impact on infectious outcomes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of home-made vs commercial gallbladder retrieval bag: a retrospective comparative study in a high-volume center.

Authors:  Roosevelt Fajardo Gómez; Francisco Javier Díaz Cuervo; Luis Felipe Cabrera Vargas; Camilo Andres Avella Molano; Francisco Alejandro Rincón Comba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Incidental gallbladder cancer diagnosis confers survival advantage irrespective of tumour stage and characteristics.

Authors:  Moath Alarabiyat; Syed Soulat Raza; John Isaac; Darius Mirza; Ravi Marudanayagam; Keith Roberts; Manuel Abradelo; David C Bartlett; Bobby V Dasari; Robert P Sutcliffe; Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 5.374

8.  Incidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies.

Authors:  Quan-Da Liu; Jun-Zhou Chen; Xiao-Ya Xu; Tao Zhang; Ning-Xin Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Use of retrieval bag in the prevention of wound infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it evidence-based? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide La Regina; Francesco Mongelli; Stefano Cafarotti; Andrea Saporito; Marcello Ceppi; Matteo Di Giuseppe; Antonjacopo Ferrario di Tor Vajana
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.