Literature DB >> 19636467

Magnetic forces produced by rectangular permanent magnets in static microsystems.

Anne-Laure Gassner1, Mélanie Abonnenc, Hong-Xu Chen, Jacques Morandini, Jacques Josserand, Joel S Rossier, Jean-Marc Busnel, Hubert H Girault.   

Abstract

Finite element numerical simulations were carried out in 2D geometries to map the magnetic field and force distribution produced by rectangular permanent magnets as a function of their size and position with respect to a microchannel. A single magnet, two magnets placed in attraction and in repulsion have been considered. The goal of this work is to show where magnetic beads are preferentially captured in a microchannel. These simulations were qualitatively corroborated, in one geometrical case, by microscopic visualizations of magnetic bead plug formation in a capillary. The results show that the number of plugs is configuration dependent with: in attraction, one plug in the middle of the magnets; in repulsion, two plugs near the edges of the magnets; and with a single magnet, a plug close to the center of the magnet. The geometry of the magnets (h and l are the height and length of the magnets respectively) and their relative spacing s has a significant impact on the magnetic flux density. Its value inside a magnet increases with the h/l ratio. Consequently, bar magnets produce larger and more uniform values than flat magnets. The l/s ratio also influences the magnetic force value in the microchannel, both increasing concomitantly for all the configurations. In addition, a zero force zone in the middle appears in the attraction configuration as the l/s ratio increases, while with a single magnet, the number of maxima and minima goes from one to two, producing two focusing zones instead of only one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636467     DOI: 10.1039/b901865d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  9 in total

1.  Magnetic Pressure as a Scalar Representation of Field Effects in Magnetic Suspensions.

Authors:  Maciej Zborowski; Lee R Moore; P Stephen Williams; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2010

2.  On-chip immuno-agglutination assay based on a dynamic magnetic bead clump and a sheath-less flow cytometry.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Zengshuai Ma; Yushu Zhang; Yue Wang; Yinuo Cheng; Wenhui Wang; Xiongying Ye
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Macrophage phenotype bioengineered by magnetic, genetic, or pharmacologic interference.

Authors:  Jarek Wosik; Martha Suarez-Villagran; John H Miller; Rafik M Ghobrial; Malgorzata Kloc
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.829

4.  Influence of immobilized biomolecules on magnetic bead plug formation and retention in capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Rachel L Henken; Rattikan Chantiwas; S Douglass Gilman
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Spinning magnetic trap for automated microfluidic assay systems.

Authors:  Jasenka Verbarg; Kian Kamgar-Parsi; Adam R Shields; Peter B Howell; Frances S Ligler
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Magnetic System for Automated Manipulation of Paramagnetic Particles.

Authors:  David J Guckenberger; Hannah M Pezzi; Mary C Regier; Scott M Berry; Kevin Fawcett; Kevin Barrett; David J Beebe
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Hybrid Magnetic-DNA Directed Immobilisation Approach for Efficient Protein Capture and Detection on Microfluidic Platforms.

Authors:  Elaheh Esmaeili; Mohammad Adel Ghiass; Manouchehr Vossoughi; Masoud Soleimani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  In situ single cell detection via microfluidic magnetic bead assay.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Pawan Kc; Ge Zhang; Jiang Zhe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Magnetic Particle Plug-Based Assays for Biomarker Analysis.

Authors:  Chayakom Phurimsak; Mark D Tarn; Nicole Pamme
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.891

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.