Literature DB >> 19635587

Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations.

Charles W Nager1, Linda Brubaker, Firouz Daneshgari, Heather J Litman, Kimberly J Dandreo, Larry Sirls, Gary E Lemack, Holly E Richter, Wendy Leng, Peggy Norton, Stephen R Kraus, Toby C Chai, Debuene Chang, Cindy L Amundsen, Anne M Stoddard, Sharon L Tennstedt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Urodynamic studies (UDS) are routinely obtained prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) despite a lack of evidence that UDS information has an actual impact on outcome. The primary aim of this non-inferiority randomized clinical trial is to determine whether women with symptomatic, uncomplicated SUI who undergo only a basic office evaluation (BOE) prior to SUI surgery (No UDS arm) have non-inferior treatment outcomes compared to women who have BOE and UDS (UDS arm). Secondary aims are: 1) to determine how often physicians use preoperative UDS results to alter clinical and surgical decision-making, 2) to compare the amount of improvement in incontinence outcomes, and 3) to determine the incremental cost and utility of performing UDS compared with not performing UDS.
METHODS: After an initial basic office evaluation, women planning surgery for uncomplicated SUI who consent to study participation will be randomized to receive preoperative UDS or No UDS. Treatment will be planned and performed by the surgeon utilizing all the data available to them. We will compare results from the basic office evaluation (No UDS) with results from the basic office evaluation and preoperative UDS.
RESULTS: The primary outcome will be measured at 12 months using responses to the Urogenital Distress Inventory and the Patient Global Index-Improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Randomized trials comparing the effects of different diagnostic alternatives on treatment outcomes pose study design challenges. A non-inferiority design is appropriate when comparing a less invasive and less expensive alternative with a standard of care approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19635587      PMCID: PMC3057197          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  26 in total

1.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Michael E Albo; Mary P Fitzgerald; Susan M McDermott; Stephen Kraus; Holly E Richter; Philippe Zimmern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile.

Authors:  S Hunskaar; A Vinsnes
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  The prevalence of urinary incontinence and its influence on the quality of life in women from an urban Swedish population.

Authors:  Z Simeonova; I Milsom; A M Kullendorff; U Molander; C Bengtsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  The "costs" of urinary incontinence for women.

Authors:  Leslee L Subak; Jeanette S Brown; Stephen R Kraus; Linda Brubaker; Feng Lin; Holly E Richter; Catherine S Bradley; Deborah Grady
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.

Authors:  Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL)

Authors:  D L Patrick; M L Martin; D M Bushnell; I Yalcin; T H Wagner; D P Buesching
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Urodynamic investigations for management of urinary incontinence in adults.

Authors:  C M Glazener; M C Lapitan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

10.  Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group.

Authors:  S A Shumaker; J F Wyman; J S Uebersax; D McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  16 in total

1.  Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Gary E Lemack; Heather J Litman; Charles Nager; Linda Brubaker; Jerry Lowder; Peggy Norton; Larry Sirls; Keith Lloyd; John W Kusek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  What is an evidence-based appropriate workup?

Authors:  Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Evaluation of the urinary microbiota of women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Krystal J Thomas-White; Stephanie Kliethermes; Leslie Rickey; Emily S Lukacz; Holly E Richter; Pamela Moalli; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; John W Kusek; Alan J Wolfe; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  When are urodynamics indicated in patients with stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Benjamin E Dillon; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Danielle Markle Price; Karen Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Linda Brubaker; Heather J Litman; Halina M Zyczynski; R Edward Varner; Cindy Amundsen; Larry T Sirls; Peggy A Norton; Amy M Arisco; Toby C Chai; Philippe Zimmern; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly J Dandreo; Shawn A Menefee; Kimberly Kenton; Jerry Lowder; Holly E Richter; Salil Khandwala; Ingrid Nygaard; Stephen R Kraus; Harry W Johnson; Gary E Lemack; Marina Mihova; Michael E Albo; Elizabeth Mueller; Gary Sutkin; Tracey S Wilson; Yvonne Hsu; Thomas A Rozanski; Leslie M Rickey; David Rahn; Sharon Tennstedt; John W Kusek; E Ann Gormley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Predicting urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  John E Jelovsek
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  The effect of urodynamic testing on clinical diagnosis, treatment plan and outcomes in women undergoing stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Larry T Sirls; Holly E Richter; Heather J Litman; Kimberly Kenton; Gary E Lemack; Emily S Lukacz; Stephen R Kraus; Howard B Goldman; Alison Weidner; Leslie Rickey; Peggy Norton; Halina M Zyczynski; John W Kusek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Surgical preparation: are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery?

Authors:  L Brubaker; H J Litman; L Rickey; K Y Dyer; A D Markland; L Sirls; P Norton; E Casiano; M F R Paraiso; C Ghetti; D D Rahn; J W Kusek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Pre-operative urodynamics in women with stress urinary incontinence increases physician confidence, but does not improve outcomes.

Authors:  Philippe Zimmern; Heather Litman; Charles Nager; Larry Sirls; Stephen R Kraus; Kimberly Kenton; Tracey Wilson; Gary Sutkin; Nazema Siddiqui; Sandip Vasavada; Peggy Norton
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.