Literature DB >> 19633778

Benefit and risk of mammography screening: considerations from an epidemiological viewpoint.

Nikolaus Becker1, Hans Junkermann.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An organized mammography screening program is being implemented in Germany since the end of 2005. Even before its inception, a heated debate surrounded the question of how to communicate its rationale appropriately.
METHODS: Selective literature review identifying facts relevant to informing decision making about mammography attendance.
RESULTS: Decision making about individual attendance for mammography screening is crucially dependent on the reduction of risk of death from breast cancer for a diseased woman. This can be communicated in the following way: out of 100 women with a diagnosis of breast cancer 31 will die within the following 10 years without screening and 20 with screening (35% fewer). DISCUSSION: The actuarial concept of risk is defined by the probability of the undesired event multiplied by the expected magnitude of loss. This approach appears more appropriate for the appraisal of risk in the context of mammography screening than a pure event probability. It could help understand why women attend screening even if they perceive the risk of getting breast cancer as low--namely, that they rank the consequences of getting the disease as highly significant for themselves and others in their social environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; early detection; epidemiology; quality assurance; randomized studies; screening; survival time

Year:  2008        PMID: 19633778      PMCID: PMC2696736          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  8 in total

1.  [Concept and implementation of model projects for mammography screening in Germany].

Authors:  H Junkermann; N Becker; H O Peitgen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Screening from the epidemiological viewpoint].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

Review 4.  [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Ingvar Andersson; Lars Janzon; Jonas Manjer; Jens Peter Garne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-03

Review 6.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  Lennarth Nyström; Ingvar Andersson; Nils Bjurstam; Jan Frisell; Bo Nordenskjöld; Lars Erik Rutqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Long-term survival of cancer patients in Germany achieved by the beginning of the third millenium.

Authors:  H Brenner; C Stegmaier; H Ziegler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  [Information on mammography screening--from deception to insight].

Authors:  I Mühlhauser; B Höldke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.635

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Our readers' voice. Letters to the editor are an important component of the discussion of scientific articles, in Deutsches Arzteblatt as in other journals. our correspondence pages reflect a diversity of opinion thanks to the love of debate among our readers--and thanks to a few rules.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge; Gabriele Seger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  [Mammography screening. Concept, quality assurance and interdisciplinary cooperation].

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; J Nährig; A Hacker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Berens; Maren Reder; Petra Kolip; Jacob Spallek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Breast Awareness, Self-Reported Abnormalities, and Breast Cancer in Rural Ethiopia: A Survey of 7,573 Women and Predictions of the National Burden.

Authors:  Wondimu Ayele; Adamu Addissie; Andreas Wienke; Susanne Unverzagt; Ahmedin Jemal; Lesley Taylor; Eva J Kantelhardt
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.