Literature DB >> 12063738

[Information on mammography screening--from deception to insight].

I Mühlhauser1, B Höldke.   

Abstract

Information about mammography-screening as a basis for informed-decision making has to be evidence-based and presented in an unbiased format. This includes communication of results about effectiveness/lack of effectiveness of screening programmes (breast cancer mortality, total mortality), the quality of mammography as a screening test (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values), and possible harm (consequences of false positive and false negative results, overdiagnosis of breast cancer, overtreatment). Outcome data have to be communicated as natural frequencies rather than relative differences. In order to avoid framing of data equal emphasis has to be put on the proportion of persons who are likely to benefit and those who are unlikely to benefit or likely to be harmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12063738     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-002-0737-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Screening from an epidemiologic perspective].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Willingness to participate in mammography screening: a randomized controlled questionnaire study of responses to two patient information leaflets with different factual content.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gummersbach; Jürgen in der Schmitten; Achim Mortsiefer; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Karl Wegscheider; Michael Pentzek
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Benefit and risk of mammography screening: considerations from an epidemiological viewpoint.

Authors:  Nikolaus Becker; Hans Junkermann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Determinants of mammography screening participation-a cross-sectional analysis of the German population-based Gutenberg Health Study (GHS).

Authors:  Roman M Pokora; Matthias Büttner; Andreas Schulz; Alexander K Schuster; Hiltrud Merzenich; Andrea Teifke; Matthias Michal; Karl Lackner; Thomas Münzel; Sylke Ruth Zeissig; Philipp S Wild; Susanne Singer; Daniel Wollschläger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gummersbach; Jürgen in der Schmitten; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Karl Wegscheider; Michael Pentzek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.