Literature DB >> 19633362

Large scale genomic instability as an additive prognostic marker in early prostate cancer.

Maria E Pretorius1, Håkon Waehre, Vera M Abeler, Ben Davidson, Ljiljana Vlatkovic, Ragnhild A Lothe, Karl-Erik Giercksky, Håvard E Danielsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcome for the individual prostate cancer patient is often difficult to predict, due to lack of reliable independent prognostic biomarkers. We tested DNA ploidy as a prognostic factor for clinical outcome in 186 patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: DNA ploidy was measured using an automatic image cytometry system and correlated with preoperative PSA, age at surgery, Mostofi grade, surgical margins and Gleason score.
RESULTS: The mean follow up time after operation was 73.3 months (range 2-176 months). Of the 186 prostatectomies, 96 were identified as diploid, 61 as tetraploid and 29 as aneuploid. Twenty-three per cent, 36% and 62% of the diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid cases respectively, suffered from relapse during the observation time. DNA ploidy, Gleason score, Mostofi grading, surgical margins and preoperative PSA were all significant predictors of relapse in a univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, only Gleason score and DNA ploidy proved to be independently predictors of disease recurrence. Furthermore, among the 68 cases identified with Gleason score 7, DNA ploidy was the only significant predictor of disease recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that DNA ploidy should be included as an important additive prognostic factor for prostate cancer, especially for patients identified with Gleason score 7 tumours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633362      PMCID: PMC4618993          DOI: 10.3233/CLO-2009-0463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Oncol        ISSN: 1570-5870            Impact factor:   6.730


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Molecular biomarkers and prognostic factors for prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; Y Tolkach; J Ellinger; G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Prognostic prostate tissue biomarkers of potential clinical use.

Authors:  Theodorus H Van der Kwast
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Genomic instability measured by inter-(simple sequence repeat) PCR and high-resolution microsatellite instability are prognostic of colorectal carcinoma survival after surgical resection.

Authors:  Bruce M Brenner; Helen Swede; Beth A Jones; Garth R Anderson; Daniel L Stoler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Automated assessment of DNA ploidy, chromatin organization, and stroma fraction to predict prognosis and adjuvant therapy response in patients with stage II colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhixun Zhao; Xiaochen Zhang; Zhongwu Li; Yibo Gao; Xu Guan; Zheng Jiang; Zheng Liu; Ming Yang; Haipeng Chen; Xiaolong Ma; Runkun Yang; Zhao Lu; Hengchang Liu; Lujing Yang; Aiwen Wu; Shuangmei Zou; Xishan Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Association between Nuclear Morphometry Parameters and Gleason Grade in Patients with Prostatic Cancer.

Authors:  Kamil Malshy; Gilad E Amiel; Dov Hershkovitz; Edmond Sabo; Azik Hoffman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 6.  An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  R G Bristow; A Berlin; A Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  [Prostate cancer. Part 1: Review of cell kinetics over the years 1966-2015 and future perspectives of the new grading of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].

Authors:  B Helpap; L Bubendorf
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Comparison of nuclear texture analysis and image cytometric DNA analysis for the assessment of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  J M Dunn; T Hveem; M Pretorius; D Oukrif; B Nielsen; F Albregtsen; L B Lovat; M R Novelli; H E Danielsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Landscape of chromosome number changes in prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Martin Braun; Julia Stomper; Robert Kirsten; David Adler; Wenzel Vogel; Diana Böhm; Nicolas Wernert; Glen Kristiansen; Sven Perner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.