Literature DB >> 1963328

Holding potential affects the apparent voltage-sensitivity of sodium channel activation in crayfish giant axons.

P C Ruben1, J G Starkus, M D Rayner.   

Abstract

Sodium channel activations, measured as the fraction of channels open to peak conductance for different test potentials (F[V]), shows two statistically different slopes from holding potential more positive than -90 mV. A high valence of 4-6e is indicated a test potentials within 35 mV of the apparent threshold potential (circa -65 mV at -85 mV holding potential). However, for test potentials positive to -30 mV, the F(V) curve shows a 2e valence. The F(V) curve for crayfish axon sodium channels at these "depolarized" holding potentials thus closely resembles classic data obtained from other preparations at holding potentials between -80 and -60 mV. In contrast, at holding potentials more negative than -100 mV, the high slope essentially disappears and the F(V) curve follows a single Boltzmann distribution with a valence of approximately 2e at all potentials. Neither the slope of this simple distribution nor its midpoint (-20 mV) was significantly affected by removal of fast inactivation with pronase. The change in F(V) slope, when holding potential is increased from -85 to -120 mV, does not appear to be caused by the contribution of a second channel type. The simple voltage dependence of sodium current found at Vh -120 mV be used by to discriminate between models of sodium channel activation, and rules out models with three particles of equal valence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1963328      PMCID: PMC1281062          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82458-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  24 in total

1.  Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; A F HUXLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Properties of the sodium gating current in the squid giant axon.

Authors:  R D Keynes
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Structural parts involved in activation and inactivation of the sodium channel.

Authors:  W Stühmer; F Conti; H Suzuki; X D Wang; M Noda; N Yahagi; H Kubo; S Numa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Saxitoxin and tetrodotoxin. Electrostatic effects on sodium channel gating current in crayfish axons.

Authors:  S T Heggeness; J G Starkus
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Sodium channels and gating currents.

Authors:  C M Armstrong
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Voltage-dependent calcium block of normal and tetramethrin-modified single sodium channels.

Authors:  D Yamamoto; J Z Yeh; T Narahashi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Ionic conductance changes in voltage clamped crayfish axons at low pH.

Authors:  P Shrager
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Evidence for a population of sleepy sodium channels in squid axon at low temperature.

Authors:  D R Matteson; C M Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Sodium channel activation in the squid giant axon. Steady state properties.

Authors:  J R Stimers; F Bezanilla; R E Taylor
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Some kinetic and steady-state properties of sodium channels after removal of inactivation.

Authors:  G S Oxford
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  A single residue differentiates between human cardiac and skeletal muscle Na+ channel slow inactivation.

Authors:  Y Y Vilin; E Fujimoto; P C Ruben
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Steady-state availability of sodium channels. Interactions between activation and slow inactivation.

Authors:  P C Ruben; J G Starkus; M D Rayner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Voltage-sensitive and solvent-sensitive processes in ion channel gating. Kinetic effects of hyperosmolar media on activation and deactivation of sodium channels.

Authors:  M D Rayner; J G Starkus; P C Ruben; D A Alicata
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Gating current "fractionation" in crayfish giant axons.

Authors:  J G Starkus; M D Rayner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Fast and slow inactivation of sodium channels: effects of photodynamic modification by methylene blue.

Authors:  J G Starkus; M D Rayner; A Fleig; P C Ruben
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Kinetic characterization of rat brain type IIA sodium channel alpha-subunit stably expressed in a somatic cell line.

Authors:  S N Sarkar; A Adhikari; S K Sikdar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Biophysical costs associated with tetrodotoxin resistance in the sodium channel pore of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Lee; David K Jones; Christopher Ahern; Maen F Sarhan; Peter C Ruben
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Sodium channel inactivation is altered by substitution of voltage sensor positive charges.

Authors:  K J Kontis; A L Goldin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Kinetic effects of quaternary lidocaine block of cardiac sodium channels: a gating current study.

Authors:  D A Hanck; J C Makielski; M F Sheets
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  A gating charge interaction required for late slow inactivation of the bacterial sodium channel NavAb.

Authors:  Tamer M Gamal El-Din; Gilbert Q Martinez; Jian Payandeh; Todd Scheuer; William A Catterall
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.086

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.