MOTIVATION: In functional genomics, it is frequently useful to correlate expression levels of genes to identify transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) via the presence of common sequence motifs. The underlying assumption is that co-expressed genes are more likely to contain shared TFBS and, thus, TFBS can be identified computationally. Indeed, gene pairs with a very high expression correlation show a significant excess of shared binding sites in yeast. We have tested this assumption in a more complex organism, Drosophila melanogaster, by using experimentally determined TFBS and microarray expression data. We have also examined the reverse relationship between the expression correlation and the extent of TFBS sharing. RESULTS: Pairs of genes with shared TFBS show, on average, a higher degree of co-expression than those with no common TFBS in Drosophila. However, the reverse does not hold true: gene pairs with high expression correlations do not share significantly larger numbers of TFBS. Exception to this observation exists when comparing expression of genes from the earliest stages of embryonic development. Interestingly, semantic similarity between gene annotations (Biological Process) is much better associated with TFBS sharing, as compared to the expression correlation. We discuss these results in light of reverse engineering approaches to computationally predict regulatory sequences by using comparative genomics.
MOTIVATION: In functional genomics, it is frequently useful to correlate expression levels of genes to identify transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) via the presence of common sequence motifs. The underlying assumption is that co-expressed genes are more likely to contain shared TFBS and, thus, TFBS can be identified computationally. Indeed, gene pairs with a very high expression correlation show a significant excess of shared binding sites in yeast. We have tested this assumption in a more complex organism, Drosophila melanogaster, by using experimentally determined TFBS and microarray expression data. We have also examined the reverse relationship between the expression correlation and the extent of TFBS sharing. RESULTS: Pairs of genes with shared TFBS show, on average, a higher degree of co-expression than those with no common TFBS in Drosophila. However, the reverse does not hold true: gene pairs with high expression correlations do not share significantly larger numbers of TFBS. Exception to this observation exists when comparing expression of genes from the earliest stages of embryonic development. Interestingly, semantic similarity between gene annotations (Biological Process) is much better associated with TFBS sharing, as compared to the expression correlation. We discuss these results in light of reverse engineering approaches to computationally predict regulatory sequences by using comparative genomics.
Authors: M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Eric Lécuyer; Hideki Yoshida; Neela Parthasarathy; Christina Alm; Tomas Babak; Tanja Cerovina; Timothy R Hughes; Pavel Tomancak; Henry M Krause Journal: Cell Date: 2007-10-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Lorenzo F Sempere; Nicholas S Sokol; Edward B Dubrovsky; Edward M Berger; Victor Ambros Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Pavel Tomancak; Amy Beaton; Richard Weiszmann; Elaine Kwan; ShengQiang Shu; Suzanna E Lewis; Stephen Richards; Michael Ashburner; Volker Hartenstein; Susan E Celniker; Gerald M Rubin Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2002-12-23 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Quan Gu; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Nicholas J Hudson; Brian P Dalrymple; Antonio Reverter Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Anil Aswani; Soile V E Keränen; James Brown; Charless C Fowlkes; David W Knowles; Mark D Biggin; Peter Bickel; Claire J Tomlin Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: George S Krasnov; Alexey A Dmitriev; Nataliya V Melnikova; Andrew R Zaretsky; Tatiana V Nasedkina; Alexander S Zasedatelev; Vera N Senchenko; Anna V Kudryavtseva Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: David D O'Keefe; Sean R Thomas; Kelsey Bolin; Ellen Griggs; Bruce A Edgar; Laura A Buttitta Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Debra L Fulton; Eric Denarier; Hana C Friedman; Wyeth W Wasserman; Alan C Peterson Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 16.971