Literature DB >> 19632017

Analysis of joint laxity after total ankle arthroplasty: cadaver study.

Kota Watanabe1, Xavier M Crevoisier, Harold B Kitaoka, Kristin D Zhao, Lawrence J Berglund, Kenton R Kaufman, Kai-Nan An.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical results of total ankle arthroplasty with early designs were disappointing. Recently-developed ankle prostheses have good mid-term results; however, limited information is available regarding effects of total ankle arthroplasty on ankle laxity.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric lower extremities were tested with a custom device which enabled measurement of multi-axial forces, moments, and displacement during applied axial, shear, and rotational loading. Tests consisted of anterior-posterior and medial-lateral translation and internal-external rotation of the talus relative to the tibia during axial loads on the tibia simulating body weight (700 N) and an unloaded condition (5 N). Tests were performed in neutral, dorsiflexion, and plantarflexion. Laxity was determined for the intact ankle, and following insertion of an unconstrained total ankle implant, comparing load-displacement curve.
FINDINGS: Laxity after total ankle arthroplasty did not approximate the normal ankle in most conditions tested. Displacement was significantly greater for total ankle arthroplasty in both posterior and lateral translation, and internal rotation, with 5 N axial loading, and anterior-posterior, medial-lateral translation, and internal-external rotation for 700 N axial loading. For the 700 N axial load condition, in the neutral ankle position, total anterior-posterior translation averaged 0.4 mm (SD 0.2 mm), but 6.0 mm (SD 1.5 mm) after total ankle arthroplasty (P<0.01). This study demonstrated more laxity in the replaced ankle than normal ankle for both unloaded and 700 N axially loaded conditions.
INTERPRETATION: These data indicate the increased responsibility of the ligaments for ankle laxity after total ankle arthroplasty and suggest the importance of meticulous ligament reconstruction with total ankle arthroplasty operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19632017     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  3 in total

Review 1.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Total ankle replacement: why, when and how?

Authors:  Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Federico Dettoni; John E Femino; Phinit Phisitkul; Margherita Germano; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

3.  Position of the prosthesis components in total ankle replacement and the effect on motion at the replaced joint.

Authors:  Francesco Cenni; Alberto Leardini; Andrea Cheli; Fabio Catani; Claudio Belvedere; Matteo Romagnoli; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.