Literature DB >> 19631964

Pierolapithecus and the functional morphology of Miocene ape hand phalanges: paleobiological and evolutionary implications.

Sergio Almécija1, David M Alba, Salvador Moyà-Solà.   

Abstract

The partial skeleton of Pierolapithecus, which provides the oldest unequivocal evidence of orthogrady, together with the recently described phalanges from Paşalar most likely attributable to Griphopithecus, provide a unique opportunity for understanding the changes in hand anatomy during the pronogrady/orthogrady transition in hominoid evolution. In this paper, we describe the Pierolapithecus hand phalanges and compare their morphology and proportions with those of other Miocene apes in order to make paleobiological inferences about locomotor evolution. In particular, we investigate the orthograde/pronograde evolutionary transition in order to test whether the acquisition of vertical climbing and suspension were decoupled during evolution. Our results indicate that the manual phalanges of Miocene apes are much more similar to one another than to living apes. In particular, Miocene apes retain primitive features related to powerful-grasping palmigrady on the basal portion, the shaft, and the trochlea of the proximal phalanges. These features suggest that above-branch quadrupedalism, inherited from stem hominoids, constituted a significant component of the locomotor repertories of different hominoid lineages at least until the late Miocene. Nonetheless, despite their striking morphological similarities, several Miocene apes do significantly differ in phalangeal curvature and/or elongation. Hispanopithecus most clearly departs by displaying markedly-curved and elongated phalanges, similar to those in the most suspensory of the extant apes (hylobatids and orangutans). This feature agrees with several others that indicate orang-like suspensory capabilities. The remaining Miocene apes, on the contrary, display low to moderate phalangeal curvature, and short to moderately-elongated phalanges, which are indicative of the lack of suspensory adaptations. As such, the transition from a pronograde towards an orthograde body plan, as far as this particular anatomical region is concerned, is reflected only in somewhat more elongated phalanges, which may be functionally related to enhanced vertical-climbing capabilities. Our results therefore agree with the view that hominoid locomotor evolution largely took place in a mosaic fashion: just as taillessness antedated the acquisition of an orthograde body plan, the emergence of the latter--being apparently related only to vertical climbing--also preceded the acquisition of suspensory adaptations, as well as the loss of primitively-retained, palmigrady-related features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631964     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  16 in total

Review 1.  Arboreality, terrestriality and bipedalism.

Authors:  Robin Huw Crompton; William I Sellers; Susannah K S Thorpe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Spinopelvic pathways to bipedality: why no hominids ever relied on a bent-hip-bent-knee gait.

Authors:  C Owen Lovejoy; Melanie A McCollum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

Authors:  Emma Nelson; Campbell Rolian; Lisa Cashmore; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A partial hominoid innominate from the Miocene of Pakistan: description and preliminary analyses.

Authors:  Michèle E Morgan; Kristi L Lewton; Jay Kelley; Erik Otárola-Castillo; John C Barry; Lawrence J Flynn; David Pilbeam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  3D geometric morphometric analysis of the proximal epiphysis of the hominoid humerus.

Authors:  Julia Arias-Martorell; Josep Maria Potau; Gaëlle Bello-Hellegouarch; Juan Francisco Pastor; Alejandro Pérez-Pérez
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  The hominins: a very conservative tribe? Last common ancestors, plasticity and ecomorphology in Hominidae. Or, What's in a name?

Authors:  Robin Huw Crompton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  The gibbon's Achilles tendon revisited: consequences for the evolution of the great apes?

Authors:  Peter Aerts; Kristiaan D'Août; Susannah Thorpe; Gilles Berillon; Evie Vereecke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A new Miocene ape and locomotion in the ancestor of great apes and humans.

Authors:  Madelaine Böhme; Nikolai Spassov; Jochen Fuss; Adrian Tröscher; Andrew S Deane; Jérôme Prieto; Uwe Kirscher; Thomas Lechner; David R Begun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Early origin for human-like precision grasping: a comparative study of pollical distal phalanges in fossil hominins.

Authors:  Sergio Almécija; Salvador Moyà-Solà; David M Alba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A partial skeleton of the fossil great ape Hispanopithecus laietanus from Can Feu and the mosaic evolution of crown-hominoid positional behaviors.

Authors:  David M Alba; Sergio Almécija; Isaac Casanovas-Vilar; Josep M Méndez; Salvador Moyà-Solà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.