BACKGROUND & AIMS: One objective of colonoscopy is to identify and remove polyps-this process requires attention to detail and prolonged concentration. Providers are predisposed to cognitive errors because the procedure is often performed repetitively throughout the day. We measured the adjusted relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 477 patients that received screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies at a Veteran's Administration (VA) teaching hospital. The primary outcome measure was polyp yield. We collected data on colonoscopy start times, which were analyzed both as a dichotomous time period ("early-morning case" vs "later case") and as a continuous variable (start time). We identified significant risk factors using univariate analysis and performed Poisson multivariable regression to measure the independent effect of colonoscopy start time on polyp yield. We evaluated evidence of decreasing polyp yield as the day progressed throughout pre-specified time intervals. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, early-morning cases yielded 27% more polyps per patient than later cases (95% confidence interval, 11%-45%; P < .001). The total numbers of, hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps found decreased hour-by-hour as the day progressed. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that early-morning cases yielded 20% more polyps per patient than later cases (95% confidence interval, 5%-38%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: At a VA medical center, more polyps were detected in patients that received colonoscopies early in the morning compared with later in the day. Moreover, adenoma detection reduced as the day progressed. Providers might be most adept at detecting polyps at the beginning of the day; further validation in other practice settings is required.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: One objective of colonoscopy is to identify and remove polyps-this process requires attention to detail and prolonged concentration. Providers are predisposed to cognitive errors because the procedure is often performed repetitively throughout the day. We measured the adjusted relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 477 patients that received screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies at a Veteran's Administration (VA) teaching hospital. The primary outcome measure was polyp yield. We collected data on colonoscopy start times, which were analyzed both as a dichotomous time period ("early-morning case" vs "later case") and as a continuous variable (start time). We identified significant risk factors using univariate analysis and performed Poisson multivariable regression to measure the independent effect of colonoscopy start time on polyp yield. We evaluated evidence of decreasing polyp yield as the day progressed throughout pre-specified time intervals. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, early-morning cases yielded 27% more polyps per patient than later cases (95% confidence interval, 11%-45%; P < .001). The total numbers of, hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps found decreased hour-by-hour as the day progressed. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that early-morning cases yielded 20% more polyps per patient than later cases (95% confidence interval, 5%-38%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: At a VA medical center, more polyps were detected in patients that received colonoscopies early in the morning compared with later in the day. Moreover, adenoma detection reduced as the day progressed. Providers might be most adept at detecting polyps at the beginning of the day; further validation in other practice settings is required.
Authors: Benjamin Lebwohl; Fay Kastrinos; Michael Glick; Adam J Rosenbaum; Timothy Wang; Alfred I Neugut Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Alexander Lee; John M Iskander; Nitin Gupta; Brian B Borg; Gary Zuckerman; Bhaskar Banerjee; C Prakash Gyawali Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Alexander Lee; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Virginia P Quinn; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 9.427