Literature DB >> 19629225

Guidelines or state civil codes in the management of femoral neck fracture? An analysis of the reality of care provision in North Rhine-Westphalia.

Rüdiger Smektala1, Angelika Grams, Ludger Pientka, Ulrich Schulze Raestrup.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes healthcare management patterns in the German Federal State of North Rhine-Westphalia, with regard to time-to-surgery and operative technique in the management of femoral neck fracture.
METHODS: Analysis of external quality assurance data relating to inpatient episodes of femoral neck fracture for North Rhine-Westphalia in the years 2004 and 2005. The study included data on 19 767 patients.
RESULTS: More than half of patients receive surgery within 24 hours of hospital admission. Large regional differences exist in relation to the type and timing of surgery. Day of the week is a key determinant of the timing of surgery. Even younger patients, in whom the hip joint should be preserved, receive delayed surgery in some regions. DISCUSSION: Structured dialog with individual hospitals revealed the following causes for the differences in care provision: guideline recommendations and the recommendations of the Federal Office for Quality Assurance ltd. (Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung, BQS GmbH), are not accepted as the basis for practice in all quarters; in some areas the necessary staff to ensure timely surgery are lacking. This situation cannot be defended to a wider public, given the clear indications from international literature that a short time to surgery reduces postoperative mortality as well as the incidence of key complications, such as pressure sores, thromboembolisms and pneumonia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  femoral neck fracture; guidelines; health services research; operative technique; time-to-surgery

Year:  2008        PMID: 19629225      PMCID: PMC2696838          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  21 in total

1.  The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture.

Authors:  I Weller; E K Wai; S Jaglal; H J Kreder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-03

2.  Factors affecting postoperative mortality of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  M B Petersen; H L Jørgensen; K Hansen; B R Duus
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  The 2004 Marshall Urist award: delays until surgery after hip fracture increases mortality.

Authors:  Kevin J McGuire; Joseph Bernstein; Daniel Polsky; Jeffrey H Silber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [On the prognosis of hip fractures. Assessment of mortality after hip fractures by analyzing overlapping segments of longitudinal data].

Authors:  R Smektala; C Ohmann; S Paech; E Neuhaus; M Rieger; W Schwabe; P Debold; A Deimling; M Jonas; K Hupe; H J Bücker-Nott; G Giani; T D Szucs; L Pientka
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The influence of immediate surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures on mortality and quality of life. Operation within six hours of the fracture versus later than six hours.

Authors:  R Dorotka; H Schoechtner; W Buchinger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-11

6.  Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications.

Authors:  J E Kenzora; R E McCarthy; J D Lowell; C B Sledge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The effects of time-to-surgery on mortality and morbidity in patients following hip fracture.

Authors:  Julia P Grimes; Patrice M Gregory; Helaine Noveck; Mark S Butler; Jeffrey L Carson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study.

Authors:  Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-22

9.  [Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. Analysis of data from health insurance providers on more than 23 million insured persons--part 1].

Authors:  R Lohmann; U Frerichmann; U Stöckle; T Riegel; M J Raschke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Rate of degeneration of human acetabular cartilage after hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  P G Dalldorf; M P Banas; D G Hicks; V D Pellegrini
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  14 in total

1.  Numerical parameters and quality indicators in a medical emergency department.

Authors:  Harald Dormann; Katharina Diesch; Thomas Ganslandt; Eckhardt G Hahn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  [Quality assurance using routine data. Is outcome quality now measurable?].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Optimal timing of operations to treat fractures of the femoral neck with endoprotheses : CRP as a parameter of postoperative immunologic reaction].

Authors:  M Neumaier; H Vester; F Martetschläger; T Freude; M A Scherer; U Stöckle
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [The influence of timing of surgery on mortality and early complications in femoral neck fractures, by surgical procedure: an analysis of 22,566 cases from the German External Quality Assurance Program].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala; U Schulze-Raestrup; C Müller-Mai
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [One-year outcomes for proximal femoral fractures: Posthospital analysis of mortality and care levels based on health insurance data].

Authors:  C M Müller-Mai; U S Schulze Raestrup; T Kostuj; G Dahlhoff; C Günster; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [More patients in a shorter inpatient stay with better outcome in treatment of femoral neck fracture: external quality assurance in Westfalia-Lippe on 50,354 patients].

Authors:  R Smektala; U Schulze-Raestrup; C Müller-Mai; H Siebert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Fractured neck of femur--internal fixation versus arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tobias Renkawitz; Peter Kramny; Michael Wenzl; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  [Medial femoral neck fractures: possible reasons for delayed surgery. Part 2: Results of data from external inpatient quality assurance within the framework of secondary data evaluation].

Authors:  R Smektala; W Schleiz; B Fischer; F Bonnaire; U Schulze-Raestrup; H Siebert; O Boy; J Kötting
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Medial hip neck fracture: influence of pre-operative delay on the quality of outcome. Results of data from the external in-hospital quality assurance within the framework of secondary data analysis].

Authors:  R Smektala; S Hahn; P Schräder; F Bonnaire; U Schulze Raestrup; H Siebert; B Fischer; O Boy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Mortality after proximal femur fracture with a delay of surgery of more than 48 h.

Authors:  M Muhm; D Klein; C Weiss; T Ruffing; H Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.