Literature DB >> 19756453

[Medial hip neck fracture: influence of pre-operative delay on the quality of outcome. Results of data from the external in-hospital quality assurance within the framework of secondary data analysis].

R Smektala1, S Hahn, P Schräder, F Bonnaire, U Schulze Raestrup, H Siebert, B Fischer, O Boy.   

Abstract

PROBLEM: According to international and national studies and clinical guidelines, patients with medial hip neck fracture should receive surgery as soon as medically reasonable after hospitalization, preferably within 48 h. Analysis of the German quality registry data of 2006 showed, however, that in 13 out of the 16 federal states less than 85% of patients were operated on within 48. Delayed surgery was found especially during the weekend.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine whether German data confirm that a short preoperative waiting time after hip fracture improves the outcome. The study was commissioned by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and was jointly performed by the German Society for Accident Surgery (DGU) and the National Institute for Quality in Healthcare (BQS). DATA AND METHODS: The analysis is based on the data of the nationwide quality registry of the years 2004-2006. Out of a total of 129,075 patients with a medial hip neck fracture 22,171 received operative treatment later than 48 h after hospital admission. Comparable study groups were constructed with the help of a propensity score (1-to-1 matching). Study and control groups only differed in terms of delay of surgery. The comparison concerning the outcomes was made with the Fisher exact test (bilateral).
RESULTS: In the group of patients with a delay of surgery longer than 48 h significantly higher rates of surgical complications (OR 1.10), general complications (OR 1.09) and pressure ulcers (1.27) were observed (all p<0.001). The in-hospital mortality showed no significant difference (OR 0.96, p=0.302).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with medial hip neck fracture should receive operative treatment without delay, if no medical contra-indications for immediate surgery. In particular appropriate organizational measures should be taken to ensure an early surgical treatment even during weekends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19756453     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-009-1674-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  23 in total

Review 1.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Avoidance of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, following fractures of the femoral neck, by early reduction and internal fixation.

Authors:  J Manninger; G Kazar; G Fekete; E Nagy; L Zolczer; S Frenyo
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient.

Authors:  Wael K Barsoum; Robert Helfand; Viktor Krebs; Christopher Whinney
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Factors affecting postoperative mortality of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  M B Petersen; H L Jørgensen; K Hansen; B R Duus
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Hip fracture in the older patient: reasons for delay in hospitalization and timing of surgical repair.

Authors:  Gretchen M Orosz; Edward L Hannan; Jay Magaziner; Kenneth Koval; Marvin Gilbert; Arthur Aufses; Elton Straus; Ellen Vespe; Albert L Siu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important?

Authors:  Christopher G Moran; Russell T Wenn; Manoj Sikand; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Outcome of hip fracture in older Irish women: a 2-year follow-up of subjects in a case-control study.

Authors:  P N Kirke; M Sutton; H Burke; L Daly
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Morbidity and mortality after hip fracture: the impact of operative delay.

Authors:  Michael Gdalevich; Dani Cohen; Dina Yosef; Chanan Tauber
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-04-17       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cynthia L Leibson; Anna N A Tosteson; Sherine E Gabriel; Jeanine E Ransom; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968-98: database study.

Authors:  Stephen E Roberts; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04
View more
  19 in total

1.  [Pertrochanteric fractures. What impact do surgical timing and implant choice have on the outcome?].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala; U Schulze-Raestrup; C Müller-Mai
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Quality assurance using routine data. Is outcome quality now measurable?].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Evaluation of a 2D fluoroscopy-based navigation system for insertion of femoral neck screws. An experimental study].

Authors:  M C Müller; P Belei; M de la Fuente; M Strake; K Kabir; O Weber; C Burger; K Radermacher; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Decreasing mortality after femoral neck fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty during the last twenty years.

Authors:  Johannes Schneppendahl; Jan-Peter Grassmann; Vanco Petrov; Friedrich Böttner; Birthe Körbl; Mohssen Hakimi; Marcel Betsch; Joachim Windolf; Michael Wild
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [The influence of timing of surgery on mortality and early complications in femoral neck fractures, by surgical procedure: an analysis of 22,566 cases from the German External Quality Assurance Program].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala; U Schulze-Raestrup; C Müller-Mai
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [One-year outcomes for proximal femoral fractures: Posthospital analysis of mortality and care levels based on health insurance data].

Authors:  C M Müller-Mai; U S Schulze Raestrup; T Kostuj; G Dahlhoff; C Günster; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Dislocated femoral neck fractures in geriatric patients. One-year follow-up].

Authors:  A Prokop; F Fröhlich; R Dolezych; M Chmielnicki
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 8.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur. What's new?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; C Straßberger; M Kieb; P Bula
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  [Medial femoral neck fractures: possible reasons for delayed surgery. Part 2: Results of data from external inpatient quality assurance within the framework of secondary data evaluation].

Authors:  R Smektala; W Schleiz; B Fischer; F Bonnaire; U Schulze-Raestrup; H Siebert; O Boy; J Kötting
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Elderly trauma patients with proximal femur fractures : Statistical evaluation of regular process data from a trauma center for the elderly].

Authors:  A König-Leischnig; J Klewer; B Karich; K Richter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.