Literature DB >> 19628691

Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI.

Xiang He1, Dmitriy A Yablonskiy.   

Abstract

Recently reported contrast in phase images of human and animal brains obtained with gradient-recalled echo MRI holds great promise for the in vivo study of biological tissue structure with substantially improved resolution. Herein we investigate the origins of this contrast and demonstrate that it depends on the tissue "magnetic architecture" at the subcellular and cellular levels. This architecture is mostly determined by the structural arrangements of proteins, lipids, non-heme tissue iron, deoxyhemoglobin, and their magnetic susceptibilities. Such magnetic environment affects/shifts magnetic resonance (MR) frequencies of the water molecules moving/diffusing in the tissue. A theoretical framework allowing quantitative evaluation of the corresponding frequency shifts is developed based on the introduced concept of a generalized Lorentzian approximation. It takes into account both tissue architecture and its orientation with respect to the external magnetic field. Theoretical results quantitatively explain frequency contrast between GM, WM, and CSF previously reported in motor cortex area, including the absence of the contrast between WM and CSF. Comparison of theory and experiment also suggests that in a normal human brain, proteins, lipids, and non-heme iron provide comparable contributions to tissue phase contrast; however, the sign of iron and lipid contributions is opposite to the sign of contribution from proteins. These effects of cellular composition and architecture are important for quantification of tissue microstructure based on MRI phase measurements. Also theory predicts the dependence of the signal phase on the orientation of WM fibers, holding promise as additional information for fiber tracking applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628691      PMCID: PMC2714760          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904899106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  Water proton MR properties of human blood at 1.5 Tesla: magnetic susceptibility, T(1), T(2), T*(2), and non-Lorentzian signal behavior.

Authors:  W M Spees; D A Yablonskiy; M C Oswood; J J Ackerman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Macromolecular interactions: tracing the roots.

Authors:  P A Srere
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Theory of FID NMR signal dephasing induced by mesoscopic magnetic field inhomogeneities in biological systems.

Authors:  A L Sukstanskii; D A Yablonskiy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole-body four-tesla magnetic fields during MRI.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis at 7 Tesla with sensitivity to iron.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hammond; Meredith Metcalf; Lucas Carvajal; Darin T Okuda; Radhika Srinivasan; Dan Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  On the origin of the MR image phase contrast: an in vivo MR microscopy study of the rat brain at 14.1 T.

Authors:  José P Marques; Rajika Maddage; Vladimir Mlynarik; Rolf Gruetter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents.

Authors:  S C Chu; Y Xu; J A Balschi; C S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Distribution of iron in the basal ganglia and neocortex in postmortem tissue in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; A R Crossman
Journal:  Dementia       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

9.  Lipid composition in different regions of the brain in Alzheimer's disease/senile dementia of Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  M Söderberg; C Edlund; I Alafuzoff; K Kristensson; G Dallner
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Malek Makki; Yulin Ge; Megha Maheshwari; Vivek Sehgal; Jiani Hu; Madeswaran Selvan; Zhen Wu; Zahid Latif; Yang Xuan; Omar Khan; James Garbern; Robert I Grossman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  110 in total

1.  The contribution of chemical exchange to MRI frequency shifts in brain tissue.

Authors:  Karin Shmueli; Stephen J Dodd; Tie-Qiang Li; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A torque balance measurement of anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility in white matter.

Authors:  Peter van Gelderen; Hendrik Mandelkow; Jacco A de Zwart; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  High-field MRI of brain iron.

Authors:  Jozef H Duyn
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

4.  Direct visualization of the subthalamic nucleus and its iron distribution using high-resolution susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Andreas Schäfer; Birte U Forstmann; Jane Neumann; Sam Wharton; Alexander Mietke; Richard Bowtell; Robert Turner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Gradient echo plural contrast imaging--signal model and derived contrasts: T2*, T1, phase, SWI, T1f, FST2*and T2*-SWI.

Authors:  Jie Luo; Bharathi D Jagadeesan; Anne H Cross; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Lorentzian effects in magnetic susceptibility mapping of anisotropic biological tissues.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Origins of R2* orientation dependence in gray and white matter.

Authors:  David A Rudko; L Martyn Klassen; Sonali N de Chickera; Joseph S Gati; Gregory A Dekaban; Ravi S Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  On the role of neuronal magnetic susceptibility and structure symmetry on gradient echo MR signal formation.

Authors:  Alexander L Sukstanskii; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy outside the central nervous system.

Authors:  Russell Dibb; Luke Xie; Hongjiang Wei; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.