Literature DB >> 29730126

Lorentzian effects in magnetic susceptibility mapping of anisotropic biological tissues.

Dmitriy A Yablonskiy1, Alexander L Sukstanskii2.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of MRI is to provide information on biological tissue microstructure and function. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is one of the newer approaches for studying tissue microstructure by means of measuring phase of Gradient Recalled Echo (GRE) MRI signal. The fundamental question in the heart of this approach is: what is the relationship between the net phase/frequency of the GRE signal from an imaging voxel and the underlying tissue microstructure at the cellular and sub-cellular levels? In the presence of external magnetic field, biological media (e.g. cells, cellular components, blood) become magnetized leading to the MR signal frequency shift that is affected not only by bulk magnetic susceptibility but by the local cellular environment as well. The latter effect is often termed the Lorentzian contribution to the frequency shift. Evaluating the Lorentzian contribution - one of the most intriguing and challenging problems in this field - is the main focus of this review. While the traditional approach to this problem is based on introduction of an imaginary Lorentzian cavity, a more rigorous treatment was proposed recently based on a statistical approach and a direct solution of the Maxwell equations. This approach, termed the Generalized Lorentzian Tensor Approach (GLTA), is especially fruitful for describing anisotropic biological media. The GLTA adequately accounts for two types of anisotropy: anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility and tissue structural anisotropy (e.g., cylindrical axonal bundles in white matter). In the framework of the GLTA the frequency shift due to the local environment is described in terms of the Lorentzian tensor L̂ which can have a substantially different structure than the susceptibility tensor χ̂. While the components of χ̂ are compartmental susceptibilities "weighted" by their volume fractions, the components of L̂ are additionally weighted by specific numerical factors depending on cellular geometrical symmetry. In addition to describing the GLTA that is a phenomenological approach largely based on considering the system symmetry, we also briefly discuss a microscopic approaches to the problem that are based on modeling of the MR signal in different regimes (i.e. static dephasing vs. motion narrowing) and in different cellular environments (e.g., accounting for WM microstructure).
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Generalized Lorentzian Tensor Approach; Magnetic susceptibility; Phase contrast; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; White matter

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730126      PMCID: PMC5989008          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  27 in total

1.  Origins of R2* orientation dependence in gray and white matter.

Authors:  David A Rudko; L Martyn Klassen; Sonali N de Chickera; Joseph S Gati; Gregory A Dekaban; Ravi S Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sphere of Lorentz and demagnetization factors in white matter.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn; Thomas M Barbara
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Membrane interactions in nerve myelin. I. Determination of surface charge from effects of pH and ionic strength on period.

Authors:  H Inouye; D A Kirschner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI.

Authors:  Samuel Wharton; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime.

Authors:  D A Yablonskiy; E M Haacke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Effects of biological tissue structural anisotropy and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility on the gradient echo MRI signal phase: theoretical background.

Authors:  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Alexander L Sukstanskii
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Susceptibility tensor imaging.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Micro-compartment specific T2* relaxation in the brain.

Authors:  Pascal Sati; Peter van Gelderen; Afonso C Silva; Daniel S Reich; Hellmut Merkle; Jacco A de Zwart; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Frequency shifts in the myelin water compartment.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Effects of white matter microstructure on phase and susceptibility maps.

Authors:  Samuel Wharton; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  The 2016 QSM Challenge: Lessons learned and considerations for a future challenge design.

Authors:  Carlos Milovic; Cristian Tejos; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Pinar Senay Özbay; Ferdinand Schwesser; Jose Pedro Marques; Pablo Irarrazaval; Berkin Bilgic; Christian Langkammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  The present and the future of microstructure MRI: From a paradigm shift to normal science.

Authors:  Dmitry S Novikov
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Imaging white matter microstructure with gradient-echo phase imaging: Is ex vivo imaging with formalin-fixed tissue a good approximation of the in vivo brain?

Authors:  Kwok-Shing Chan; Renaud Hédouin; Jeroen Mollink; Jenni Schulz; Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum; José P Marques
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.737

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.