Literature DB >> 19628147

Family structure, nonresident father involvement, and adolescent eating patterns.

Susan D Stewart1, Chadwick L Menning.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between family structure, nonresident father involvement, and adolescent eating patterns.
METHODS: Analyses were performed on data from Waves 1 and 2 of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Wave 1, N = approximately 15,550; Wave 2, N = approximately 11,540), and a subsample of adolescents from each wave who had a nonresident father (Wave 1, N = approximately 3,745; Wave 2, N = 2,358). Multivariate regression provides estimates of the independent effects of family structure and nonresident father involvement on adolescent eating patterns while controlling for potentially confounding sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Compared with children in traditional households (i.e., two biological or adoptive parents), adolescents in nontraditional family households (single parent, step-parent, no parent) were more likely to display unhealthy eating habits such as skipping breakfast and lunch, eating fewer vegetables, consuming more fast food, and had less parental monitoring of meals. Nonresident father involvement was associated with an increased frequency of eating breakfast and lunch and increased consumption of vegetables (Wave 1) but did not affect adolescents' consumption of fast food. Child support was positively associated with the odds that adolescents would consume dinner.
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents in living in nontraditional families were more likely than adolescents living with two biological/adoptive parents to display unhealthy eating habits. Nonresident father involvement was generally associated with healthier eating patterns. Health professionals should keep in mind that children's and adolescents' living arrangements can be complex and have the potential to affect what and how they eat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628147     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  28 in total

1.  Cohabitation and Child Wellbeing.

Authors:  Wendy D Manning
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  2015

2.  Single Motherhood, Living Arrangements, and Time With Children in Japan.

Authors:  James M Raymo; Hyunjoon Park; Miho Iwasawa; Yanfei Zhou
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2014-08-01

3.  Deconstructing family meals: Do family structure, gender and employment status influence the odds of having a family meal?

Authors:  Mienah Z Sharif; Héctor E Alcalá; Stephanie L Albert; Heidi Fischer
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  ASSESSING CAUSALITY AND PERSISTENCE IN ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN FAMILY DINNERS AND ADOLESCENT WELL-BEING.

Authors:  Kelly Musick; Ann Meier
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2012-06-01

5.  "Low-Income Men and Fathers' Influences on Children?"

Authors:  Marcia J Carlson; Katherine A Magnuson
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2011-05

6.  Body size estimation and other psychosocial risk factors for obesity onset among US adolescents: findings from a longitudinal population level study.

Authors:  J M Liechty; M-J Lee
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Diversity in fathers' food parenting practices: A qualitative exploration within a heterogeneous sample.

Authors:  Neha Khandpur; Jo Charles; Rachel E Blaine; Christine Blake; Kirsten Davison
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 8.  Parental perceptions and childhood dietary quality.

Authors:  Kristi B Adamo; Kendra E Brett
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

9.  Associations of family meal frequency with family meal habits and meal preparation characteristics among families of youth with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  M L Kornides; T R Nansel; V Quick; D L Haynie; L M Lipsky; L M B Laffel; S N Mehta
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.508

10.  Youth proxy efficacy for fruit and vegetable availability varies by gender and socio-economic status.

Authors:  Karly S Geller; David A Dzewaltowski
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.