BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T classification system for cholangiocarcinoma does not take into account the unique pathologic features of the bile duct. As such, the current AJCC T classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma may be inaccurate. METHODS: A total of 147 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma were identified from a single institution database. The prognostic importance of depth of tumor invasion relative to the AJCC T classification system was assessed. RESULTS: The AJCC T classification was T1 (n = 11, 7.5%), T2 (n = 6, 4.1%), T3 (n = 73, 49.7%), or T4 (n = 57, 38.8%). When cases were analyzed according to depth of tumor invasion, most lesions were > or =5 mm (<5 mm, 9.5%; range, 5-12, 51.0%; >12 mm, 39.5%). The AJCC T classification was not associated with survival outcome (median survival, T1, 40.1 months; T2, 14.8 months; T3, 16.5 months; T4, 20.2 months; P = .17). In contrast, depth of tumor invasion was associated with a worse outcome as tumor depth increased (median survival, <5 mm, not reached; range, 5-12, 28.9 months; >12 mm, 12.9 months; P = .001). On multivariate analyses, tumor depth remained the factor most associated with outcome (<5 mm; hazard ratio [HR] = referent vs 5-12 mm; HR = 3.8 vs >12 mm; HR = 6.7 mm; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The AJCC T classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma does not accurately predict prognosis. Depth of the bile duct carcinoma invasion is a better alternative method to determine prognosis and should be incorporated into the pathologic assessment of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma.
BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T classification system for cholangiocarcinoma does not take into account the unique pathologic features of the bile duct. As such, the current AJCC T classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma may be inaccurate. METHODS: A total of 147 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma were identified from a single institution database. The prognostic importance of depth of tumor invasion relative to the AJCC T classification system was assessed. RESULTS: The AJCC T classification was T1 (n = 11, 7.5%), T2 (n = 6, 4.1%), T3 (n = 73, 49.7%), or T4 (n = 57, 38.8%). When cases were analyzed according to depth of tumor invasion, most lesions were > or =5 mm (<5 mm, 9.5%; range, 5-12, 51.0%; >12 mm, 39.5%). The AJCC T classification was not associated with survival outcome (median survival, T1, 40.1 months; T2, 14.8 months; T3, 16.5 months; T4, 20.2 months; P = .17). In contrast, depth of tumor invasion was associated with a worse outcome as tumor depth increased (median survival, <5 mm, not reached; range, 5-12, 28.9 months; >12 mm, 12.9 months; P = .001). On multivariate analyses, tumor depth remained the factor most associated with outcome (<5 mm; hazard ratio [HR] = referent vs 5-12 mm; HR = 3.8 vs >12 mm; HR = 6.7 mm; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The AJCC T classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma does not accurately predict prognosis. Depth of the bile duct carcinoma invasion is a better alternative method to determine prognosis and should be incorporated into the pathologic assessment of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Authors: Seung-Mo Hong; Alison E Presley; Edward B Stelow; Henry F Frierson; Christopher A Moskaluk Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hari Nathan; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; John L Cameron; Richard D Schulick Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-09-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ekaterina Petrova; Felix Rückert; Sebastian Zach; YinFeng Shen; Jürgen Weitz; Robert Grützmann; Uwe A Wittel; Frank Makowiec; Ulrich T Hopt; Peter Bronsert; Florian Kühn; Bettina M Rau; Roman E Izrailov; Igor E Khatkov; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Louisa Bolm; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck; Ulrich F Wellner; Gabriel Seifert Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Raul S Gonzalez; Pelin Bagci; Olca Basturk; Michelle D Reid; Serdar Balci; Jessica H Knight; So Yeon Kong; Bahar Memis; Kee-Taek Jang; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Grace E Kim; Jeanette D Cheng; N Volkan Adsay Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Lauren M Postlewait; Cecilia G Ethun; Nina Le; Timothy M Pawlik; Stefan Buettner; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Kenneth Cardona; Shishir K Maithel Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Gil Yosipovitch; Kyle C Mills; Leigh A Nattkemper; Ashley Feneran; Hong Liang Tey; Brett M Lowenthal; Daniel J Pearce; Phillip M Williford; Omar P Sangueza; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 10.282