Pesi H Katrak1, Deborah Black, Victoria Peeva. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital and School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, High Street, Randwick, NSW, Australia 2031. p.katrak@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcome of stroke patients with cerebral infarction (CI) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after rehabilitation. DESIGN: Review of a prospectively maintained database of all stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit during a 9.5-year period. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit in a university hospital in Australia. PATIENTS: A total of 718 consecutive stroke admissions (589 CI and 129 ICH) who met the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, FIM efficiency, Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) change, gait velocity, and discharge destination. RESULTS: Patients who had ICH were more severely disabled on admission compared with patients who had CI and achieved a greater functional improvement with rehabilitation, ie, a greater FIM efficiency and a greater MAS change. Admission FIM score, admission MAS score, and length of stay were significant explanatory variables for the discharge FIM and FIM gain in both ICH and CI patients. On general linear model analyses, stroke type remained a significant explanatory factor for FIM gain, after adjusting for admission FIM, length of stay, age, and days from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission, ie, stroke patients with ICH obtained a better functional outcome than patients with CI. Admission motor FIM, admission MAS, younger age, and increasing length of stay were independent predictors for FIM gain and discharge FIM for both CI and ICH groups. Admission cognitive FIM score predicted discharge FIM for both the CI and ICH groups and FIM gain in the ICH group but was not a predictor of FIM gain for the CI group. The majority of patients in both groups went home at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with ICH had a greater level of disability on admission to rehabilitation, they achieved significantly greater gains in function than patients with CI after rehabilitation. This was found regardless of the severity of disability on admission.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcome of strokepatients with cerebral infarction (CI) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after rehabilitation. DESIGN: Review of a prospectively maintained database of all strokepatients admitted to a rehabilitation unit during a 9.5-year period. SETTING: Rehabilitation unit in a university hospital in Australia. PATIENTS: A total of 718 consecutive stroke admissions (589 CI and 129 ICH) who met the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, FIM efficiency, Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) change, gait velocity, and discharge destination. RESULTS:Patients who had ICH were more severely disabled on admission compared with patients who had CI and achieved a greater functional improvement with rehabilitation, ie, a greater FIM efficiency and a greater MAS change. Admission FIM score, admission MAS score, and length of stay were significant explanatory variables for the discharge FIM and FIM gain in both ICH and CI patients. On general linear model analyses, stroke type remained a significant explanatory factor for FIM gain, after adjusting for admission FIM, length of stay, age, and days from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission, ie, strokepatients with ICH obtained a better functional outcome than patients with CI. Admission motor FIM, admission MAS, younger age, and increasing length of stay were independent predictors for FIM gain and discharge FIM for both CI and ICH groups. Admission cognitive FIM score predicted discharge FIM for both the CI and ICH groups and FIM gain in the ICH group but was not a predictor of FIM gain for the CI group. The majority of patients in both groups went home at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with ICH had a greater level of disability on admission to rehabilitation, they achieved significantly greater gains in function than patients with CI after rehabilitation. This was found regardless of the severity of disability on admission.
Authors: Anirudh Sreekrishnan; Jennifer L Dearborn; David M Greer; Fu-Dong Shi; David Y Hwang; Audrey C Leasure; Sonya E Zhou; Emily J Gilmore; Charles C Matouk; Nils H Petersen; Lauren H Sansing; Kevin N Sheth Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce Dobkin; Samuel S Wu; Qinglin Pei; Pamela W Duncan Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Hanna C Persson; Arve Opheim; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Margit Alt Murphy; Anna Danielsson; Katharina S Sunnerhagen Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2016-10-17
Authors: Juan Manuel Marquez-Romero; Antonio Arauz; José Luis Ruiz-Sandoval; Erick de la Cruz-Estrada; Maria Raquel Huerta-Franco; Gerónimo Aguayo-Leytte; Angélica Ruiz-Franco; Humberto Silos Journal: Trials Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 2.279