Literature DB >> 19627272

Lifespan extension by dietary restriction is not linked to protection against somatic DNA damage in Drosophila melanogaster.

Ursula Edman1, Ana Maria Garcia, Rita A Busuttil, Dylan Sorensen, Martha Lundell, Pankaj Kapahi, Jan Vijg.   

Abstract

Dietary restriction (DR) has been shown to robustly extend lifespan in multiple species tested so far. The pro-longevity effect of DR is often ascribed to an increase in cellular defense against somatic damage, most notably damage by reactive oxygen species (ROS), considered a major cause of aging. Especially irreversible damage to DNA, the carrier of genetic information, is considered a critical causal factor in aging. Using a recently developed transgenic Drosophila melanogaster model system harboring a lacZ-plasmid construct that can be recovered in E. coli, spontaneous DNA mutation frequency in flies under DR and ad libitum conditions are measured. Three different DR conditions, imposed by manipulating levels of different types of yeast sources, were tested in females and males of two lacZ reporter gene lines. Feeding with the ROS producer paraquat at 1 mM resulted in a rapid accumulation of somatic mutations, indicating that the frequency of mutations at the lacZ locus is a reliable marker for increased oxidative stress. However, none of the DR conditions altered the accumulation of spontaneous mutations with age. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of DR are unlikely to be linked to protection against oxidative somatic DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19627272      PMCID: PMC2917806          DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00480.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Cell        ISSN: 1474-9718            Impact factor:   9.304


  25 in total

1.  Distinct spectra of somatic mutations accumulated with age in mouse heart and small intestine.

Authors:  M E Dollé; W K Snyder; J A Gossen; P H Lohman; J Vijg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Demography of dietary restriction and death in Drosophila.

Authors:  William Mair; Patrick Goymer; Scott D Pletcher; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Effect of dietary restriction on in vivo somatic mutation in mice.

Authors:  J L Dempsey; M Pfeiffer; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Natural selection for extended longevity from food restriction.

Authors:  D E Harrison; J R Archer
Journal:  Growth Dev Aging       Date:  1989 Spring-Summer

5.  Food, reproduction and longevity: is the extended lifespan of calorie-restricted animals an evolutionary adaptation?

Authors:  R Holliday
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Effect of caloric restriction on Hprt lymphocyte mutation in aging rats.

Authors:  Anane Aidoo; Roberta A Mittelstaedt; Michelle E Bishop; Lascelles E Lyn-Cook; Yi-Ju Chen; Peter Duffy; Robert H Heflich
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway.

Authors:  Pankaj Kapahi; Brian M Zid; Tony Harper; Daniel Koslover; Viveca Sapin; Seymour Benzer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  DNA damage and ageing: new-age ideas for an age-old problem.

Authors:  George A Garinis; Gijsbertus T J van der Horst; Jan Vijg; Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  Understanding the odd science of aging.

Authors:  Thomas B L Kirkwood
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Calories do not explain extension of life span by dietary restriction in Drosophila.

Authors:  William Mair; Matthew D W Piper; Linda Partridge
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  12 in total

1.  The effect of sexual harassment on lethal mutation rate in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Simone Immler; Hanne Løvlie; Ilona Flis; Urban Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Age- and temperature-dependent somatic mutation accumulation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia; R Brent Calder; Martijn E T Dollé; Martha Lundell; Pankaj Kapahi; Jan Vijg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 4.  Impact papers on aging in 2009.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny; Judy Campisi; David A Sinclair; Andrzej Bartke; Maria A Blasco; William M Bonner; Vilhelm A Bohr; Robert M Brosh; Anne Brunet; Ronald A Depinho; Lawrence A Donehower; Caleb E Finch; Toren Finkel; Myriam Gorospe; Andrei V Gudkov; Michael N Hall; Siegfried Hekimi; Stephen L Helfand; Jan Karlseder; Cynthia Kenyon; Guido Kroemer; Valter Longo; Andre Nussenzweig; Heinz D Osiewacz; Daniel S Peeper; Thomas A Rando; K Lenhard Rudolph; Paolo Sassone-Corsi; Manuel Serrano; Norman E Sharpless; Vladimir P Skulachev; Jonathan L Tilly; John Tower; Eric Verdin; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Xenohormetic and anti-aging activity of secoiridoid polyphenols present in extra virgin olive oil: a new family of gerosuppressant agents.

Authors:  Javier A Menendez; Jorge Joven; Gerard Aragonès; Enrique Barrajón-Catalán; Raúl Beltrán-Debón; Isabel Borrás-Linares; Jordi Camps; Bruna Corominas-Faja; Sílvia Cufí; Salvador Fernández-Arroyo; Anabel Garcia-Heredia; Anna Hernández-Aguilera; María Herranz-López; Cecilia Jiménez-Sánchez; Eugeni López-Bonet; Jesús Lozano-Sánchez; Fedra Luciano-Mateo; Begoña Martin-Castillo; Vicente Martin-Paredero; Almudena Pérez-Sánchez; Cristina Oliveras-Ferraros; Marta Riera-Borrull; Esther Rodríguez-Gallego; Rosa Quirantes-Piné; Anna Rull; Laura Tomás-Menor; Alejandro Vazquez-Martin; Carlos Alonso-Villaverde; Vicente Micol; Antonio Segura-Carretero
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Sex Differences in Aging: Genomic Instability.

Authors:  Kathleen E Fischer; Nicole C Riddle
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Hormesis does not make sense except in the light of TOR-driven aging.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  Molecular damage in cancer: an argument for mTOR-driven aging.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 9.  SkQ1 treatment and food restriction--two ways to retard an aging program of organisms.

Authors:  Vladimir P Skulachev
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  Age- and diet-associated metabolome remodeling characterizes the aging process driven by damage accumulation.

Authors:  Andrei S Avanesov; Siming Ma; Kerry A Pierce; Sun Hee Yim; Byung Cheon Lee; Clary B Clish; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.